Unit 10: Reflective Essay on Professional Issues

3555 Words15 Pages
INTRODUCTION Traditionally the cornerstones of professionalism are regarded as knowledge, responsibility and autonomy. The aim of this paper is to reflect on whether this remains the case or are there corrosive elements undermining the professionalism of teachers in post-compulsory education (PCE). DISCUSSION A professional is considered knowledgeable in both subject matter which is intuitive (Armitage et al 2003), and societal problem solving knowledge that leads to social expansion Furlong, (Ed. Atkinson & Claxton 2000). Eraut (1994) agrees with this stating three areas or contexts of knowledge which can be subdivided into subject matter, classroom-related and management. Classroom-related identifies what students can do with the teacher as facilitator; management what the organisation expects of the teacher. Subject matter knowledge is regarded as: a) objective knowledge Furlong, (Ed. Atkinson & Claxton 2000), based in science giving validity; b) it is supported by various theoretical models allowing it to be applied in specific cases. Objective knowledge is external and needs a long lead in time to acquire, in other words lengthy training periods. This is true of doctors who spend five years in higher education understanding this validated researched knowledge and how to then apply it in the treatment of their patients. By the same principle PCE teachers are vocational in their subject knowledge which is brought to the classroom to enable students. Armitage et al (2003) believes individuals in PCE who bring about learning in a formal setting for which they are paid can regard themselves as professionals. They contend because someone is paying for it this sort of formal learning has a different value from that imparted by a retired teacher who is not paid. If all types of knowledge are classed the same this might diminish the paid
Open Document