Due to lack of supervision many mistakes were made by Joynes and language was purposely put in the contract that led Hurt to escape liability and this caused the client to lose out on a great deal of money. Issue Whether Attorney Musselman acted neglieglently by assigning the case to Mr. Joynes and not supervising his. Whether Attorney Musselmwas negligent and breached his fiduciary duty as counsel to the Corporation. . Holding The trial court found that the defedant was negligent as both attorney and officer and fined him $243,722.99.
12 Angry Men Essay Eric Juror #3 was the antagonist throughout the story, he argued with everyone and stuck to his belief throughout the story. Juror #3 was also biased and very angry with all the other jurors, and that impacted what others thought about him, but towards the end of the movie juror #3 has a emotional breakdown and showed everyone why he was being biased and angry. Juror #3 was very opinionated, rude, and has hidden sensitive side. Juror #3 was very opinionated he crossed over the line into insensitivity and rudeness about the defendant being guilty. His opinions stayed strong threw the whole story until the end when he revealed is true feelings about his teenaged son who causes him to be hateful and opinionated about everything.
Juror #4 the Wall Street guy was very analytical about his vote. For the most part of the movie he didn’t sweat despite the fact that it was extremely hot in the room and that he had on a full suit. He was settled that the boy was guilty until Juror #8 and some others convinced him. Juror #5 was the gentleman from the slums. He really didn’t show his past, so you would have never guessed that he was.
He tries to prove how animal testing affects animals, but the evidence that he gives us was some kind of violence and lacking police protection. These evidences do not match with the idea that he tells us that “lacking adequate police protection, fearing for the lives of their employees… bringing it to the brink of bankruptcy”. I feel that the writer uses red herring. He keeps bring up criminal issue instead of talking about how animal testing effects on animals. Moreover, the writer gives evidence that I feel it does not make sense “the crime against Huntington are not isolated incidents; animal rights terrorists commit more than 1,000 crimes annually”.
I st arted to be convinced, you know, with the testimony from those people across the hall" (12 Angry Men , p.137.) This quote from six clearly shows his slowness to the situation and also his characteristi c of coming upon his opinions slowly and being hard to convince. I believe that Six does not really fully understand the entire situation with the murder and really isn't sure who he agrees with. Howe ver he takes all the jurors opinions into consideration and eventually makes the right choice to vot e non-guilty. Another characteristic of six is that he is a calm man and is one of the few jurymen t hat actually wants to stay in the room and keep the debate going.
Persuasive essay Would you not do whatever it takes just to know that there is one less murderer on our planet? Give justice to the vistim’s grieving family at any cost? Many people believe that capital punishmant is unethical and should be abolished. But presently, the crime rate is rapidly increasing due to the lack of effective capital punishment. The murderers deserve to be executed like they killed their victims.
Juror 8s personality in a brief description is thoughtful and assertive. In contrast with juror 8, Mrs. Jones shows she is aggressive and sassy. For prove of this, throughout the story 12 Angry Men, Juror 8 is thoughtful by showing sympathy to the boys background. While Mrs. Jones show being aggressive by dragging roger down the street in a half-nelson. Pursuing their contrasts further they are different from where they stand in each situation.
Juror 4 undermines himself as he said that the boy must be guilty as he can’t remember the name of the films that he saw but when asked himself about the last films that he saw he cannot remember the names of the films and the name of the actors and actresses in them. Juror 3 undermines himself as he said as the boy was heard saying I’m going to kill you this means that he must have done it as saying this means that you really want to kill them and you will while later in the play after being fired up and agitated by juror 8 the 3rd juror says ‘I’m going to kill
PETA also attacked McDonalds for the same reason in hope that their powerful image throughout the world would influence the farms and slaughterhouses to change their ways. Instead of attacking the source, they attack the companies that buy from them to try to embarrass them and ruin their reputation. These independent companies that sell chicken as well as other meats make a small profit when all is said and done. The way that these companies can make a profit is by trying to make themselves as efficient as possible, which can cause them to treat animals poorly. These corporations are out of the public view and are largely anonymous, which makes it difficult to target.
This movie was all about non-ethical and lazy like sayings, such as: “lets get it over quick” and “who really cares”. One guy, the 8th juror, did not agree with these saying’s and believed that a tough decision like this could not be decided in 5 minutes. He played a smart game, which we call ’playing devils advocate’. While the 11 men thought the person charged was guilty, this one juror thought differently. The 12 angry men were your average men, but each one had a different side.