To What Extent Were Henry Vi Failings Responsible for the Outbreak of Conflict in 1455?

964 Words4 Pages
To what extent were Henry VI failings responsible for the outbreak of conflict in 1455? In some ways, Henry VI’s failings could be classed as wholly responsible for the outbreak of conflict in 1455. However, other factors remain and other people can be to blame for the eventual downfall of the monarchical state. Henry VI managed to fail not only in his political leadership but his military leadership as well. If it cannot be pinned on, what A.J Pollard can be quoted as calling, his overall astounding “antipathetic nature towards to the chivalric world his ancestors had adored”, it can definitely be blamed on what A.J Pollard called his “improvident, malleable, vacillating and partisan” personality. Due to Henry’s careless habit of only rewarding his friends (mainly Suffolk and Somerset) he managed to create tension in the council as well as creating an imbalance of power between himself and his subjects. In addition, Henry let his wife, Margaret of Anjou have a semblance or power over the happenings at court which further created unease. Pope Pius II proved his dislike for Henry and his failures at leadership by showing obvious displeasure at the fact that a large amount of decisions were “left to his wife’s hands”. As Margaret of Anjou was a woman and French, there was much aversion to her having a say in the King’s court which damaged the king’s image both locally and internationally. Through Henry’s preference to Somerset, he removed Richard Duke of York from the position of military leader in France and replaced him with Somerset. Due to Richard being heir presumptive and proving to be a strong character in court, Anjou further removed him and made him the post leader in Ireland which, back then, was considered a grave dishonour as Ireland was thought of as some barbaric land where the population spoke Gaelic not English and in essence, ruled
Open Document