To What Extent Was Germany a Parliamentary Democracy in the Years 1900-1914?

879 Words4 Pages
To what extent was Germany a parliamentary democracy in the years 1900-1914? Since 1871, Germany had a constitutional monarchy. The Reichstag was the elected parliament, and the Kaiser was the head of state but had no legislative power. The chancellor and government officals were appointed and dismissed by the Kaiser, not directly chosen by voters, which therefore, by definition, makes Germany an autocracy. Germany was not a parliamentary democracy in any shape or form. The Herero Revolt took place from 1904-1907 and resulted in the subjection of a deliberate policy of genocide including execution and incarceration in concentration camps, dramatically reducing the number of Herero people by 80%. The chosen punishment for the revolt was slated massively by many people, including Matthias Erzberger, highlighting the lack of financial control in parliament and pointing out that the punishment for the Herero rebellions had cost the state 456 million marks, a substantial amount of money. This incident produced a political crisis, and the political parties in the Reichstag were no longer content as they had previously been. This refusal to agree with each other and frequent 'slating' of the decisions was not the appropriate conditions for a democracy, as many people would be unhappy for a majority of proposed arrangements. It is argued that an autocracy worked better in this situation as one person was able to finalise decisions, avoiding unecessary conflicts in the Reichstag. Therefore, almost by default, Germany appeared to work as a democratic system. The year 1908 marked the event of The Hottentot Election. The Centre Party joined the SPD in voting down government plans for a railway that would ruin the lives of the colonists that had settled down in the way. Von Bulow retaliated to The Centre Party and SPD party alliance by dissolving the Reichstag,
Open Document