The nature or nurture debate is concerned the with the contributions of genetic inheritance, and environmental factors to human development. The nature theory says, although traits such as as eye and hair colour and genetics diseases are determined by genes, that there are also different qualities, for example, Intelligence, Personality, Homosexuality. Some others would say that, we learn or discovers all them above. We learn and improve our intelligences, we probably inherit certain personality traits from the things/people around us and some people may be curious of their preferences,
First is the idea that people can learn through observation. Next is the idea that internal mental states are an essential part of this process. Finally, this theory recognizes that just because something has been learned, it does not mean that it will result in a change in behaviour. Piaget – Cognitive Development He became intrigued with the reasons children gave for their wrong answers on
Nature vs Nurture There has always been controversy over whether inherited genes or the environment influences and affects our intelligence, development, behavior, personality, and ability more then the other. This debate is recognized as nature verses nurture. Sure heredity gives us our physical traits like hair, height, eye color, etc, but the environment plays a greater role in shaping someone’s personality. From personal experience, I believe that nurture has made a bigger impact in my personality then nature. I refuse to believe that people are born with a personality; it all lies with ones up bringing and experiences.
Behaviorist approach works very differently from biological approach in Health and Social care. There are many differences between the two and how they are used to aid people with many disorders. The behavioral approach assumes that all behavior is learn and that when we are born we are like a blank piece of paper. Behaviorists and social learning theorists are some of the examples of scientists and psychologists who believe in the nurture side of the debate. They believe that children can be molded and shaped by the environment through behavior modification, rewards and punishments.
For centuries scientists’ aim has been to observe not only the physical, but also the mental nature of a human being and its diverse, complex features. While it is clear to everyone that physical appearances are present from the outset, perceptual and intellectual abilities turn out to be not so readily monitored or inferred. Whether the way one perceives the world and the surrounding environment is a cause of an innate ability or is due to learning and experience, has been considered as one of the most controversial and thought-provoking topics in the wide area of psychology. Various findings in support of both naturists’ and nurturists’ view gave rise to a never ending dispute called ‘’Nature versus Nurture’’ which is not even close to being over. Due to a growing interest in infants’ ability to perceive the surrounding world in the early 20th century various research studies and experiments aiming to observe and investigate newborns’ nature were conducted.
A skill that will support work with children is behaviour management. It is necessary for working with children as it is important for lessons to happen as planned. It will easier for one to know how to manage difficulties or problems as it will provide more time to children's learning. for example, control the momentum of lessons. As pupils may lose interest in lessons, it may cause problem for forthcoming activities you may break down activities that need doing and explain things rather than children losing interest from learning.
In this study, young children saw a film of an adult widely hitting a five-foot-tall inflatable punching toy called a Bobo doll (Bandura, Ross, 1963a, 1963b).later the children were given the opportunity to play with the Bobo doll themselves, and sure, most displayed the same kind of behavior, in some cases mimicking the aggressive behavior almost identically. Therefore, I stand for the fact that media violence does relate to aggressive and violent behavior. First claim related to your main thesis. To further expound on the research claim by Albert Bandura he believed that television was a source of behavior
General Principle of Social Learning Theory 1. People can learn through observation. I n his famous "Bobo doll" studies, Bandura demonstrated that children learn and imitate behaviors they have observed in other people. The children in Bandura’s studies observed an adult acting violently toward a Bobo doll. When the children were later allowed to play in a room with the Bobo doll, they began to imitate the aggressive actions they had previously observed.
The psychologists observe and simplify what they see. Reading all the action, face and palm will not be accurate as solid. That is why now days the scientists has invented machine to detect lies. Our brain has certain waves to recognize our behavior Therefore, more to science to be concluded in the field of psychology. Psychology also can be in the field of biology.
With the right environment, nurture, and determination I’m sure one can excel to their full capacity in traits such as intelligence or athleticism. I may be incorrect and I even might have my own bias but that is what I truly think and believe. Before we tackle on this longly debated predicament, we must understand that there are many different perspectives on the nature versus nurture topic. A biological psychologist might approach the problem focusing on genetic, hormonal, and neurochemical explanations of behavior, leaning more towards