To What Extent Did the Government and Administration of Elizabethan England Depend on the Person and Image of the Queen?

1038 Words5 Pages
Elizabeth’s image was carefully cultivated; she wore an uncompromising public mask for the entirety of her reign. As a person she has been described as aloof, enigmatic, extravagant and intelligent. As a woman she had to surmount assumptions that her sex would lead her to be an inferior monarch, as well as restore the faith in the monarchy that had been dismantled by Mary’s tyrannical rule. She gained valuable lessons from Mary’s reign and used her femininity to gain obedience rather than an axe! The subordination of her own personal feelings and desires to meet the needs of her country showed a determination and dedication that inspired loyalty from her government and her subjects (Levine 1969, p.1-15). The government and administration of England depended on her image to varying degrees, which will be explored in the following essay. Elizabeth’s rejection of her sex when speaking publically “I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a King.”(Elizabeth I, cited Milward 1961,p.101) is representative of her ambiguous nature. She rejects her sex at one juncture, and uses it to her advantage at another. She spoke of her subjects as though they were her husbands “for if they did not rest assured of some special love to them, they would not yield me such good obedience” (Elizabeth I, cited in Levine 1969,p.5). She used these underhand tactics with those closest to her. Submissiveness to a woman was not a natural condition of men like Leicester, Essex and Raleigh. Yet Elizabeth inspired obedience and devotion from these men using her femininity and equivocality. The devotion she inspired made it difficult for plotters to remain undiscovered (Levine 1969,p.6-7). The making of policies demanded her ambiguity. Elizabeth’s conduct, image and person were all politically motivated. Even her closest advisor William Cecil, it is
Open Document