Titus Andronicus And Julius Caesar Power

2142 Words9 Pages
He who placed me in this seat will keep me here. - Queen Elizabeth I These words spoken by the reigning queen during Shakespeare’s lifetime, Elizabeth I, reflect on the trademark ideology of the Elizabethan period that the monarchy was divinely willed into power. Due to the prevalence of the Monarchy in England, Shakespeare sheds much needed light on the rejection of power and its consequences. Through Titus Andronicus and Julius Caesar, the audience is urged to ponder the consequences of rejecting a significant amount of power by two very distinct individuals in two very unique societies; the rejection of power is highly influenced by each candidate’s personal desire, intention, and system of values. During the Elizabethan age, the system of values one upholds was centered around the community; birth into this community meant having an innate calling to serve the people, and placing their welfare before one’s own. To abnegate power—may it be emperorship or kingship—implied the rejection of one’s duty to their community; it can be inferred as putting personal self-interest over that of the whole community, or in this case, state. Titus, the prime character in Titus Andronicus, feels compelled, even in his sovereign setting, to yield the throne to the “next in line,” his predecessor’s eldest son, Saturninus. Titus’ rejection of the emperor title is based on his traditional value system and unfit, old age—both reasons being extremely personal in nature. Au contraire, Caesar delivers a more superficial rejection of his people’s request for his coronation; his greedy, manipulative intentions take a front seat to the welfare and the value system of his people in his exhibition of a humble persona designed to sway the people in his favor. Titus’ rejection of power partially makes him responsible for the chaos that ensues upon Saturninus’ rule. On the other hand,
Open Document