Those Who Walk Away from Omelas

494 Words2 Pages
Is the sacrifice of one individual’s freedom justified if it is for the good of the rest of the society? The message in the short story, “The Ones Who Walked Away From Omelas" by Ursula LeGuin, shows the reader that it is justified if it benefits more people than it hurts. In the city of Omelas, the boy needs to be locked up so that the rest of the citizens can live joyous lives. Most might say that the way the boy is treated is cruel and inhumane, but it is necessary so that none of the citizens can complain about problems in their lives. If they can’t complain about problems, since their troubles aren’t nearly as bad as the boy’s they can not be sad or down. In Omelas, the positive and negative aspects balance each other out. Everyone in the town knows that the boy is locked up there, and they all know that their constant “happiness... [and] the health of their children... depend on this child’s misery." The price they pay for their perfect lives is that this one child has to be locked up forever, it is a pretty small price to pay for eternal joy. No matter how many bad things happen to the boy, they will be balanced out by the incredibly good things that happen to the citizens of Omelas. If the citizens tried to help the boy, they know that the pleasures of their city wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for the sacrifice of the boy. If the boy was taken out of the room, all of the “beauty and delight of Omelas would wither and be destroyed." If they tried to rescue them, they would ruin their happiness and that of their kids, so as much as some might despise it,
Open Document