Thomson's Arguments On The Abortion Debate

2081 Words9 Pages
Yanira Moncada Philosophy 20 To be or not to be? Who has the right to answer that question? Abortion: is there any situation in which it can truly be justified, or is it simply an act of immorality? Within this essay, I will show how Thomson’s arguments on abortion outweigh those of Marquis’, through her use of detail, leading to Thomson having, overall, a much more valid argument than Marquis. Even with objections being presented by opposing groups, Thomson’s arguments are stronger and much more persuasive than arguments possibly presented by those who oppose her ideas. In Susan’s case, she is an innocent woman who was made a victim of rape after a Bon Jovi concert leading her to have an unwanted pregnancy. Being that it was not her intention to have a child at the time, or possibly to even have intercourse that night, she decides that the best…show more content…
Given that Susan did not necessarily plan to have a child at that stage in her life would not make it fair that it be put upon her. I strongly agree with Thomson’s view that the fact that she didn’t offer her body to have a child within her, she then has no obligation to keep the fetus alive. And for her to have an abortion may be a bit selfish and inconsiderate of the baby’s potential, but it would not be unjust for her to do so. In Tammy’s case, after having decided to keep the child, to decide to get an abortion so late into the pregnancy is in fact unjust. By doing so, she taking away the fetus’ life because it would be so inconvenient for her in the short run of her life. It is because of her reasoning that Tammy should continue with the pregnancy. The moment she decided to keep the child is the moment she decided she was ready to raise that child, and terminating the pregnancy at that point would be an act of unjust killing, seeing as how greatly developed the fetus

More about Thomson's Arguments On The Abortion Debate

Open Document