“There Is No Such Thing as an Insignificant Character in Shakespeare.” in Light of This Statement, Explore the Presentation of Minor Characters in the Tempest

532 Words3 Pages
“There is no such thing as an insignificant character in Shakespeare.” In light of this statement, explore the presentation of minor characters in The Tempest It could be argued that the tempest is in some ways completed by its minor characters, their roles stretch far beyond providing the humour that deems this play a tragic comedy. Shakespeare’s use of minor characters allow him to strategically criticise social and political issues often appealing to an audience of a lower social statue, whilst interesting and fundamentally not offending the government or monarchy. This is why Shakespeare is often described as being “socially mobile”. This essay will attempt to explore how Shakespeare has created many dimensions for his minor characters, and how their motives are carefully balanced by their outcomes. Trincelo and Stefano seem most obviously to be buffoonery , and to have the sole purpose of providing comic relief following the intensity of act ii scene I. indeed We meet Tricelo as he attempts to seek shelter from a brewing storm which may be interpreted as pathetic fallacy reflective of the growing dramatic tensions of the play . However for large marjority of a jacabein audience these two charcters are not only comedic but the most relatable. Trincelo sees Caliban and is both repulsed as well as curios of him unsure weather he is “ a man or a fish” . For modern critics who debate the role of Caliban tricelos reaction provides light into how Caliban may have been prevised at the time. This is becoue Tincelo and steffano are to put it simply ordinary people with ordinary views yet within extrodinary circumstances . In light of this Melvyn Bragg argues as “they find him mosterious and we can presume therefore that caliban was played as monsterious.” Trincelo and steffano embody the
Open Document