Joe admits he ‘construed’ Clarissa’s narrative but he does not explain how. This absence of explanation is predominantly strange, bearing in mind that a lot of narrative in earlier chapters concerned itself with metafiction. As readers we have to guess how this has been constructed. The impression that Joe has used Clarissa’s diary to create the narrative in the chapter is stood out by the list of events that occur in it. These events appear to be unexpected and unconnected to the other characters, so it deducts from the suspense.
Therefore the reader is forced to wonder if it would be better to know the facts or to be left in suspense; is knowledge worth the realization of facts that were intended to remain unknown? From the first chapter till the last few pages of the book, the narrator, Jack, hosts an ongoing battle of “innocence vs. awareness” within himself. Towards the beginning of the novel Jack claims to believe in the principle “ignorance is bliss” so much as to seem nihilistic: “…after I got hold of that principle I became an idealist…If you are an idealist it does not matter what you do or what goes on around you because it isn’t real anyway.” (Warren 45). In spite of his strong beliefs in the beginning of the story, Jack’s views begin to change in chapter eight after he informs Judge Irwin of the
Faulkner occupies the use not just only multiple narrators, but also the perplexity of stream-of- consciousness to intensify the failure to differentiate between reality and understanding. This use of a person's thoughts and conscious reactions to events lets the commentary to be revealed as if were actually reading what they’re thinking. Thoughts arise with no jurisdiction and as such allow the mark of directness. Also, since As I Lay Dying is developed from the characters emotions rather than conversation between characters, the first feeling is to naturally consider since peoples thoughts are mostly unrefined. The use of stream-of-consciousness also serves to conceal the way to finding the ideal
1. Four symptoms of groupthink present in the case study provided to us are how Tom, Susie, and Richard have all already come up with a plan for the group based on their own prior experiences without knowing Mark or Betty’s strengths for group contribution. The second symptom of groupthink comes in the form of Richard and Susie’s body language toward Mark asking about the professor’s requirements which seems to challenge the thinking and plan of the subgroup formed by Tom, Susie and Richard. The third form of groupthink present in this case study is Mark and Betty’s comfortableness at “addressing their misgivings about the team assignment” to the professor based on their previous experience with the rest of the members of the group. The last symptom of groupthink in this case study happened when the all members of the group decide to turn in the assignment despite their earlier feelings and attitudes.
I disagree with certain idea and issue Rene Descartes argues about in his passage. His beliefs of skepticism at points were valid at times but every human has a right to believe, do anything or create what they want to believe in their mind. To make it feel real is up to the person because we control our emotions which control our mind set to think if we are being trick to having ten fingers or to believe there is no god that created this world we call earth. The scope of knowledge in this reading "Meditations on first philosophy" by Rene Descartes is the truth of doubt. Doubt causes people to believe that you do not know something when you actually do.
My judgments are my own and it’s unique. I can’t predict when it happens and when to shut it down, just like my heart beats. I thought this way because whenever I am are faced with someone or something new, I don’t necessarily think over my thoughts to see if it’s reasonable or if I should not think these thoughts. I was questioning how Gladwell will be able to educate and teach someone to control their judgments and first impressions because everyone is different and their thoughts are of course not the same. However, I do understand how learning to control my snap judgments and first impressions is important because it gives people a second chance to prove who they are but everyone is entitled to their own judgment and not everyone has to agree with
However, what the novel fails to reveal is the answer to the deeming question “why?” Although this may be Cain’s way of allowing his readers to interpret the novel on an individual level, it seems to instead lead his readers down a path of misunderstanding and forced assumptions. For example, Phyllis initiates a dialogue between her and Walter, “‘Do you understand me Walter?’ ‘No.’ ‘Nobody could.’ ‘But we’re going to do it?’ ‘Yes, we’re going to do it’’’ (19). In this dialogue, Walter and Phyllis are confirming that they will follow through with their plan. Cain makes it obvious that Walter does not understand where Phyllis is coming from in her insistence of this plan and yet for reasons that are unclear to readers, Walter is still involving himself in the crime. The dialogue of a story is an important part of characterization because it allows the readers to see into the characters minds and examine their motivations.
The reader also infers that Jig may at first appear helpless but later she reveals that she’s ready to make her own decision. We can also see that the American sees himself as the responsible one of the two and that he later realizes that they aren’t going to stay
Because your partner is the person you have power over and by using deception they can’t truly see what you are doing, so they go on not doing anything bad because they don’t know if they can see you but they might be watched. Especially if you are a couple who always has to know where each other is. A synonym for deception is bad faith which is really spot on for what she is talking about in her essay because that’s what adultery is just plain old bad faith. And if you have this power of deception you are also somewhat harnessing the power of the panopticon. Deception is just another agency where you can lose power without even knowing it because of your ability to not see what is going
Nicks Liability Not every narrator is the voice of the author. Before considering the "gap" between author and narrator, we should remember how, as readers, we respond to the narrator's perspective, especially when that voice belongs to a character who, like Nick, is an active participant in the story. In The Great Gatsby, the story is told through the eyes of an active, biased, participant. Nick Carraway has a special place in this novel. He is not just one character among several, it is through his eyes and ears that we form our opinions of the other characters making him unreliable.