The Role of Women in Shakespeare

1144 Words5 Pages
Shakespeare's men are perhaps the topic of conversation that comes to mind, when one discusses his catalog. From Othello to Romeo, Kings Henry V and Richard III, all strong men who had to face much personal, and sometimes public, adversity and helped shape how we perceive gender roles in modern society. However, if one were to look past the tangled story lines, the strong and weak men in his body of work, and all the other minutia, we find the women that impacted the lives of those men, and even the roots of some of the social stigmas we deal with today. In order to really understand the how deeply Shakespeare influenced the stigmas on gender roles we deal with today, one must go back to his time and understand how women were perceived back then. Women who were born into “higher ranked” families would often be presented as possessions and even passed around between fathers and husbands. They were to obey the orders cast over them by the men of the house, and were often socially restricted to the point of being unable to explore the world around them, unless accompanied by chaperones; The men controlled every aspect of their lives. Conversely, those women who would be considered as “independent” in modern society, were perceived as lower class, and were often crass and much more aware of their surroundings and sexuality. One could even say that their “low status” rendered them socially harmless. However, much like their “upper-class” counterparts, they too were owned. Perhaps it is the reason why a woman who acts much like a man, has multiple partners and expresses her independence is perceived as a whore, whilst it is perfectly acceptable for a man to act in such a fashion; some might even say it’s expected. It’s a clear example of Shakespearian influence. In addition, powerful women in history such as Gloria Steinem, Jane Fonda, Jodie Foster, et al. have
Open Document