The Role Of Sentencing In Criminal Law

815 Words4 Pages
During the course of a trial, one of the final stages is that of sentencing. In the sentencing phase of the trial, the defendant receives his or her appropriate legal punishment for the crime that they are convicted of committing. Once someone is convicted of a crime, whether they are found guilty through a guilty plea, plea bargain, or jury, the judge may impose any of a number of varying punishments. These punishments include fines, incarceration in jail or prison, probation or a suspended sentence, monetary payment to the victim, community service time, or rehabilitation for drug or alcohol offenses (Croteau, 2009). Sentencing in Criminal Law The sentencing phase takes place nearly after convictions or guilty pleas are entered.…show more content…
Hailing from an immigrant family, Al Capone quit school after the sixth grade and began his life of crime in a notorious street gang along side with such other infamous villains as Lucky Luciano (Quimby, 1969). It didn’t take long for Capone to join the Colosimo mob in Chicago, engaging in rackets brought about by prohibition, and soon he was among the most powerful men in the world. He funneled the money gained by illegal brewing, distilling, and distribution of beer and liquor into legitimate businesses such as cleaning and textiles. Through Capone, they were able to capture influence with public officials and corrupt politicians, police officers and labor unions towards their goals. In addition, he was also involved in highly aggressive gang activities, such as murders, armed robberies, and carrying concealed weapons without permits. Due to his connections, it was very difficult to find a judge or jury that would convict Capone of his crimes, though they were widely-known. Eventually, Capone was brought up on tax evasion and through the tireless efforts of the U.S. Treasury department, Capone was sentenced to eleven years in federal prison. Additionally, he was fined $50,000, charged $7,692 for court costs, and $215,000 plus interest due to back taxes owed to the government (Kobler, 1971). He was then released after serving only six months and having paid his fines…show more content…
It is good that they were able to arrest and convict him of a crime, even if it wasn’t anywhere near what he should have been. The circumstances surrounding the sentencing were clear to the presiding judge, and he went for what he could in the spectrum of the crime’s statutes. Since then, the corruption has been cleared up significantly and though it still exists somewhere to some degree, it has nowhere near the hold it did over Capone’s

More about The Role Of Sentencing In Criminal Law

Open Document