The dialogue also helps foreshadow the story. This is because Millar has them speak as if they’re telling fate. How John speaks like a hard worker, one who regrets his bad choices in life and he speaks as if he would do any thing for a second chance to prove his loyalty to all around him; foreshadows how he refuses to sign a contract that will betray his friends. In the crucible three characters are introduced and they hold their ways of doing things through the story. This shows great characterization in the play.
A ghoul is known to take lives from corpes so because of this you could say that he exists because of the girl’s death. The inspector is seen as a very solid and characters that has massiveness. He is also seen to grow bigger and stronger as the other characters are seen to break down. “He creates at once an impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness”. Throughout the play priestly demonstrates how people are responsible for how they affect the lives of others.
Wallace also strongly points out that we need to be “a little less arrogant” and not believe solely in our preconceived notions about things, because we usually tend to be wrong. We must be aware of our surroundings and learn how to control how and what we want to think. Wallace says that we get to decide what has meaning and what does not, and we must do this with awareness, an open mind, and give ourselves choices of how to view situations. Bertrand Russell tells readers in “The Problems of Philosophy” that unlike typical sciences where one discovers correct answers, we are constantly searching for the value of philosophy. Russell says that philosophy does not find right answers, but rather encourages thinking.
And in recent times, I have begun to appreciate the importance of a particular idea I find fascinating. I became curious about what it is in our lives that adds fuel to the fires of our everyday struggles, and the impacts that our conflicts have upon our individual morality. Do we indeed drive our personal battles because of an inherent selfishness, and, conversely, do our conflicts cause us to become totally concerned with our own personal, and often materialistic, desires? When writing the play, developing the character of John Proctor was relatively simple: he was to be a flawed hero. He was to be a hero who, when compared to the moral goodness of a Rebecca Nurse, was to be considered a more realistic character and possibly a more attainable example of humanity.
The importance of one’s persona is clearly demonstrated throughout the play 12 Angry Men, most importantly through jurors 8 and 10. In Reginald Roses' 12 Angry Men, the persona created surrounding Juror 8 portrays him as a compassionate man, who seeks justice and truly cares about humanity, contrasting from the judgemental and prejudice persona of Juror 3, which ultimately leads to the validity and persuasiveness of their argument. In the creation of his powerful argument, Juror 8 forms a personna characterizing a compassionate and fair man. Juror 8 begins his argument by declaring that “its not easy for [him] to raise [his]hand and send off a boy to die without talking about it first.” (12) This remark shows him as a charitable and understanding person who values human life and is unwilling to send an innocent off to die. It also demonstrates his clear motives by presenting his desire for complete knowledge of the case, before making a critical decision.
But you’re partly to blame’’. Here Priestley uses the Inspector to show that you must be intent on your actions as they could have an affect on others. Like the old saying, ‘what goes around comes around’. But looking at that quote,
Either way could make the judger or the person giving the opinion look bad, so it is almost dangerous. I believe we must always go with our gut instinct on what is right. If we see a person as someone who is doing something for him or herself, we
An effective play takes the audience on an emotional and intellectual journey Shakespeare’s Othello is an effective play as it takes the audience on an emotional an intellectual journey. The effectiveness of Othello is seen through the journey from reason to emotion in Othello as it causes a reaction from the audience, which is the aim of an effective play. The play focuses mainly on the emotional journey Othello takes, which the audience follows along with. Othello is a tragedy and the purpose of the play is to teach the audience a moral lesson and have the audience feel pathos and reach a cathartic response at the conclusion of the play. The two characters of Othello and Iago can be used in juxtaposition to imply how outside forces have great influences on the life of a person and how that in turn affects the individuals journey and how it can finish somewhere different that what was initially expected.
When he decided to choose the latter, it was transparent that the trails had changed him drastically as he appeared to be a stubborn man in the beginning. By the end, Proctor chose to die in the most righteous way. In the beginning, Proctor could be described as stubborn and somewhat selfish, but by the end of it, he was anything but these qualities. The characters who were wrongfully accused were symbolic to an actual crucible and the trials that they been through was a furnace where we are expected to tell the “truth” when the trials itself is based on false accusations. In conclusion, The Crucible was an excellent title for the play.
He knows what he should do, but he continues to deny, until his wife is put into jail. John cares about his reputation, but he must confess his sin, in order to stop the frenzy in Salem and save his wife. After he confesses, he encourages his wife to do the same, “Elizabeth, tell the truth, I have confessed it!” John says. John needs to muster up all his courage to confess the adultery, and it is not easy for Qu- Page2 him. John is a vainglorious man, but love makes him brave to face his sin.