“The Necklace” Versus “The Story Of An Hour”

2701 Words11 Pages
“The Necklace” versus “The Story of an Hour” Fernanda Floresta ENG 125 Introduction to Literature Kristina Stutler June 13, 2011 “The Necklace” versus “The Story of an Hour” In the patriarchal world of the nineteenth-century women were oppressed from society and they had to stay home as housewives, cleaning, cooking and doing the household work (Jamil, 2009). They did not have any rights or value in the eyes of society. These concepts have changed drastically on the most recent years. Women now are more independent and really try to better themselves by studying and working. In literature, we are able to view what were the roles of women years ago. Women were not expected to work, and their only future was to be married and have children, and some marriages were loveless marriages. This is exactly what happened to the women in these short stories; they were repressed and were unhappy with their lives: The “Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant and “The Story of An Hour” by Kate Chopin. In both stories, authors portray the story of two women that have different stories, but with almost the same type of problems. The similarities and differences from both stories are that both women are in unhappy marriages, the theme of the stories, the irony, the symbolism, they were written using the third-person point of view, both had loving husbands, and the end of both stories are sad and tragic. The short story “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant is the story of a young woman named Mathilde Loisel and her husband-the little clerk of the Ministry of Public Instruction. Mathilde lived a poor life, which made her to suffer. She had the dream to be rich, to have beautiful clothes and jewels. Throughout the whole story she would complain of being poor and her embarrassment. One day her husband was invited to a grand ball where only the rich people will be. Her

More about “The Necklace” Versus “The Story Of An Hour”

Open Document