The Eyes of Skin

1115 Words5 Pages
Reflection: The Eyes of Skin In The Eyes of Skin by Juhani Pallasmaa, he explains in the section spaces of scent how a particular smell makes us unknowingly re-enter a space completely forgotten by the retinal memory. Pallasmaa suggests that the most persistent memory of any space is often its smell and that it brings back childhood memories for many people. He also argues that buildings and architecture have a much greater purpose on this earth than we as individuals often give them credit for. Pallasmaa says on page 292 that “The nostrils awaken a forgotten image, and we are enticed to enter a vivid daydream. The nose makes the eyes remember.” Here he is saying that as soon as we walk into a room or building the scent we smell helps us remember a memory we have had there. For example, older buildings may have a more stale and moldy smell to it rather than a newer building. These scents often seem to play a part in the effect that the building has on us. Darker buildings or colder buildings may have a more negative feeling and impact on us where as a more vivid building that is lighter has a more positive impact on us. Some could argue that smell doesn’t always necessarily bring back a memory. For example if you enter a building or space you have never been in before it may not trigger a certain memory like other buildings are able to. Some could also argue that vision is greater in producing a fond memory more so than smell because some people may be more drawn to a certain object such as a toy that is able to trigger a negative or positive memory from their childhood. On page 293, Pallasmaa also says “Why do abandoned houses always have the same hollow smell? Is it because the particular smell is stimulated by emptiness observed by the eye? “Here he is asking why it seems that when we go into certain places they always seem to have the same smell as another
Open Document