Rhetorical Analysis of The Evil of Animal Rights “The Evil of Animal Rights” is an article that was written by Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook. The article addressees the medical testing that is being done on animals. The author of the article talks about the medical advances that have been done using animals as testing. Without the animals, there wouldn't be as many new medicines and new cures that there are now. The author also talks about the protesters and the problems they have given to the companies that have any relation with animal testing.
Animal Experimentation Thesis: Experimenting on animals should be stopped because it is inhumane. I. Experimenting on animals is cruel. A. Draize Eye Test 1. Rabbits are held down and scientist put chemicals into their eyes to see how they react to it.
Drug manufacturers test medications on animals after they have been injected with viruses and diseases to see if the medications work on the animals. There are many companies who use animal research to test their products; unfortunately these organizations do not look for alternatives besides animal testing. If these atrocious acts were committed outside laboratories, they would be felonies. But animals suffer and die every day in laboratories with little or no protection from cruelty. It is immoral to
Fred creates an extraction lab containing 26 caged, violently abused puppies. Naturally, everybody is expected to be upset with Fred’s behavior. Norcross compares the condition that these puppies endured to the animals that Americans consume from factory farms. He goes on to state that there aren’t any legitimate morally significant difference in how Americans treat their future food compared to how Fred treated his tortured puppies. Norcross compares the behavior of meat eating Americans to Fred’s behavior.
In this analysis the activist approach to animal rights is too extreme. The progress mankind has achieved in industrialization, technology, mathematics, and science first began when humans decided to stop chasing their food. They domesticated animals which allowed them to experience more free time in which they could focus on more advanced
Why continue to test animals that may give inaccurate results on products that can still be sold to the human race? Now there are groups who say that there is no alternative to animal testing, and that animals have saved many human lives, but if the
Some companies have a strong belief that animal testing is essential in order to make sure that consumers are protected during the use of their products. For the fact that we allow this to happen in our world is pathetic, and it all comes down to pure selfishness’, an ugly trait in which human’s possess. How can it be rational to take the life out of something because it can’t show or tell someone if they’re in agony? Over the years there have been numerous amounts of companies that have stood strong on not participating in animal cruelty; realistically it should be the only way. Humans are at fault here; before it’s too late we must realize that each living creature has a choice and should never be taken away by pure
When a person is unsure on whether or not that they will live to see their next birthday, the last thing that they are worried about is if the treatments that they are taking, that is fighting a war inside their body, was tested on the animals in a humane way. Animal testing is a benefit to society. It has saved countless lives with the how much it has contributed to medical research and has ensured the general public’s safety with how it has played a major role in the rules and regulations of food, drugs and cosmetics. The abolishment of animal testing would mean that researchers would not be able to find drugs and treatments for medical purposes. Animal research has played a pivotal role in virtually every major medical advancement for both human and animal health in the last century.
Individual have diverse feelings for animals. Sorrowfully animal lovers cannot fight for their side, yet they still combat to save animal lives. Animals used as their companions while others view that animals are for scientific survey course only. Several scientists only think how to making their test flourish without knowing that animal they use are being abused and maltreated. Not all tests are relevant to human health.
constructive speech Animals can be used in lab experiment . First of all, Animal Experiment Provides a Platform for Medical Research: Now we manage to treat diseases like measles, smallpox, malaria today which are all horrible disease only because of animal experiment. The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. Without these experiment, we may even not have the chance standing here to make this debate! Secondly,Animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to human beings in many ways.