The Ethical Consequences Of Bombing Auschwitz

4461 Words18 Pages
Abstract The research question of this investigation is whether or not the Allies should have bombed Auschwitz concentration camp. Britain and the United States boasted two of the strongest air forces in the world during the Second World War, yet such an operation never came to fruition. The bombing operation would have targeted the camp itself and the railway tracks leading towards its perilous gates. In order to assess this research question numerous secondary and primary sources were utilized from scholarly articles, journal articles, newspaper articles, and first person accounts. This examination of sources helped bring forth strong arguments for both bombing opponents and proponents. The scope of this investigation shall deal with bombing oppositions during the war, photo reconnaissance by Allied aircrafts, the Vrba-Wetzler escapee report, railway bombing feasibility, aircraft considerations, the side effects of bombing, operation considerations, and ethical consequences. Historiography has been weaved into every…show more content…
The British were unable to bomb the gas chambers and crematoria for sound technical reasons. From about the end of August 1944, the Americans could have bombed these installations. Senior air commanders were justified in their decision because numerous sorties against V-1 rocket sites, barges, petroleum oil, lubricant depots, roundhouses, airfields, power stations and other German military installations would have been sacrificed due to the amount of aircrafts required to bomb Auschwitz. Heavy prisoner casualties would have arisen and the uncertainty of success would have posed grave moral questions. Overall, the Joint Chief of Staff, the British Foreign Office, the Royal Air Force, the War Department and senior officials knew that their air power was imperfect and finite and thus acted
Open Document