Jasmine Tyler 09/11/14 4B Bedford 114-119 Meaning 1. She responded because she fit most of the criteria and she was curious as to what they would say. She also responded because the $25,000 could have changed her life. She also may have done it to see the people happy. To her they are complete strangers but during and after the fact that she gives the egg, they would eventually have to become a lot closer due to the fact that she has pretty much given them a baby.
Dana Stevens "Thinking Outside the Idiot Box" is a direct response to Steven Johnson's essay " Watching TV makes you Smarter". Stevens said that she did not understand what his article was about. She did not really agree with anything besides that watching tv is okay-- you should'nt watch a lot of it but you should watch a decent amount of it. Some things that Stevens seemed to talk a lot about was that Johnson metioned something the show 24 saying that it is "nutritional" but fails to mention that there was controversy over plot lines that had to do with torture and representation of Muslim terrorists in the show. But she does mention that the show did somehow get social issues into the show which can open viewers eyes about what is going
Thinking Outside the Idiot Box In the essay, “Thinking outside the Idiot box” Dana Stevens argues that watching TV should be about your entertainment. It shouldn’t focus on whether it makes you less of a person. Stevens primarily uses a logical argument to support her sarcasm toward Stevens Johnson’s article, Watching TV makes you smarter.” Stevens start her essay off with a lot of sarcasm on Johnson article, “Watching television makes you smarter.” She directs her attention to everyone in the world who watches TV. She states, “ those of us who grew up in caveman days, fashioning crude stone tools while watching Starsky and Hutch, are indeed now better positioned than our forebears to follow such complex narrative fare as The Sopranos” (Stevens 232). This let us know she is not just focusing on one age group.
Media Affects Adolescents Body Image Ellen Goodman uses an anthropological study to prove her argument in her essay “The Culture of Thin Bites Fiji.” She looks at the culture of Fiji before and after television is introduced into that culture. Before television weighting more was the desired outcome for women symbolizing that they have plenty to eat, after television was introduced to the people of Fiji imitating the thinner, beautiful actresses on television programs became normal for the young women in that society. Ellen Goodman uses a study by Anna Becker, an anthropologist and psychiatrist at the Harvard Eating Disorder Center, to argue that though they do not want to recognize it, the media and media figures have a negative effect on how adolescent girls view themselves, and their body image, and is also contributing to eating disorders not only in Fiji, but all around the world. Drastic changes took place once television was introduced into the Fijians culture. It only took thirty eight months for seventy four percent of teenagers to feel too big or too fat, and sixty two percent started to diet.
Chanel Morales Thursday, March 1, 2012 Beauty and the Media Society looks down upon being fat; the media is constantly coming up with ways to eliminate fat from our bodies. Susan Bordo in her “Never Just Pictures” essay states, “Fat is the evil, and we are continually beating him.” Today people are obsessed with their bodies. People are starving and purging their bodies to be “perfect”. Bordo opens eyes as to what causes people to think, “Thin is in”, and why this problem is continuing to grow. Bordo’s argument is effective because her sources support her reasons and strengthen her ethos, her word choice, and she’s also able to refute a potential counterargument to prove her claim that the media has influenced body image.
Television the Plug in Drug In the essay “Television the Plug in Drug” Marie Winn asserts the “television contribution to family life has been an equivocal one. For a while it has, indeed, kept the member of the family from dispersing, it has not served to bring them together.” The author develops her thesis through the use of analogies, cause and effect, order of importance, simile and chronological order. Winn’s use of these strategies is intended to shock her audience into realizing how televisions and their usage can be harmful to them
Response to Paul Campos’s Article “Being Fat Is Okay” Is being fat really OK? According to Paul Campos being fat is not a problem, as he explains why in his article “Being Fat Is Okay”. He believes that the government and diet industries are dishonest and are working together by making people believe that overweight people are unhealthy. He has three points that support his opinion which he sees as lies from the diet industry. While many things Campos emphasizes in his article could be true in a few cases that doesn’t mean everyone has his same opinion.
Johnson, Greg. Understanding Joyce Carol Oates, 1987: 101-02 Johnson “interprets the story as a feminist allegory (221)”. He describes Connie as being empty inside and heading towards the same fate most women face, “sexual bondage (221)”. His interpretation is bias in the way he insinuates that most women freely give themselves to men like Arnold Friend instead of necessity. Rubin, Larry.
Call to Action (You asked the question “How can I be successful at practicing abstinence?” According to the American pregnancy Association here are some helpful tips; Do things with friends or with groups, go on double dates, minimize physical interaction that could lead passionate moments and last but not least avoid situations when you’re alone. Q. Who is responsible for the problem? The problem with adults practicing abstinence it’s the act of doing so, it’s the fear of being judge for doing so. We are responsible for this being a good think for our youth and never really talked about in adulthood.
If the procedure is carried out in a state of the art hospital, then the risk is in fact very low, as low as some risky professions that we do permit like a deep-sea diving. If we merely appeal to outcomes then so long as we can check whether the people are being rational when they’re making the decision to sell their kidney, we would expect it to be good all-round. However, it is not the case that humans are entirely rational, (BEHAVIOURAL) and what about developing countries who perhaps lack adequate healthcare or after-care facilities? The absolute position, put forth by market proponents: that buying internal body parts from informed, voluntary and autonomous sellers is morally permissible is highly