The Constitution Pros And Cons

1108 Words5 Pages
Constitution Paper In the wake of The Revolutionary war, The Continental Congress faced significant debt, economic challenges and lack of elected authority to resolve financial and trade issues. They resolved to form a legal framework in which they would have elected authority to print money, pay off war incurred debt, and manage trade. The Articles of Confederation were drafted between 1776 and 1777, by principal author John Dickinson, a lawyer who also wrote “Letter From a Farmer in Pennsylvania”. All thirteen American states ratified the Articles by the year 1781. While the Articles formed a representative governing body called The Committee of States, and outlined its authority to declare war, deal with international treaties, address…show more content…
This law making body would have an upper and lower house. In the upper house, called the Senate, each state would have the same number of representatives. In the other house, called Congress, each state’s number of representatives would vary according to the states’ population, given one representative per thirty thousand state citizens. This approach, originally called The Great Compromise, was proposed by a man named Roger Sherman, and ended a stalemate between large and small states, who had been bitterly vying for a form of representation most advantageous to their larger or smaller…show more content…
Georgia, feeling the threat of Spain south in Florida, and Indian conflicts to its west, soon also ratified. Pennsylvania followed by the winter of 1788. As the ratification debate continued, two separate philosophies emerged in response. Supporters of the Constitution became known as the Federalists, underscoring their philosophical idea that the states, as a federation formed the united body, not the governing body alone. They stressed that the newly created form of central government did not threaten the states’ rights. The Anti-Federalists touted the “spirit of ‘76” (Schultz, page 15) in favor of a weaker central government, preservation of states’ rights, strong individual liberties and at the very least a robust bill of rights to protect individual liberties. Ratification stalled as Anti-Federalists from larger states such as Massachusetts, New York and Virginia refused to ratify until a bill of rights for citizens was guaranteed, and Federalists, eager to see the Constitution enacted, resisted lengthy amendments to the Constitution for fear of having to begin writing the entire framework over
Open Document