The Argument For Personal Induction Screeeds

681 Words3 Pages
not complete yet “A personalised induction will always be more effective” Discuss Base your answer on theoretical concepts and techniques presented in class. (Construct an argument – do you agree or disagree. Whatever the view you must demonstrate your knowledge of the alternative position and should produce evidence to support the argument. Plan, select and describe relevant material You need to show that you have a full awareness of modalities and the part they play in inductions. Also, you'll need to discuss how you decide whether to adopt a permissive or authoritarian approach and why it matters. One danger with focussing on personalised inductions, is that they could almost imply that one's preferences and modalities. are fixed. This is not the case. You might meet me for an initial consultation, presume I am primarilly visual and inclined to prefer an authoritarian approach. However, the following weeks events could mean that next time we meet - after you've prepared your personalised induction - it is not at all appropriate or effective. On top of all this, it is important to mention the idea of 'compounding'. So, to avoid some of the scenario above, why stick to just visual, when you could add auditory and kinaesthetic on top? And if you're gonna do that, why not do it all of the time? In one sense, we use personalised inductions because people are individuals and deserve the personal touch. However, it it precisely because we recognise that people are individuals and dynamically unique, that we recognise that an initial consultation can't tell you everything you ever need to know about someone. A personalised induction can presume too much, as if you've now got the person tagged and know all about their modalities, etc. Personalising inductions also includes taking into account a client's likes and dislikes, their work, hobbies they have and so

More about The Argument For Personal Induction Screeeds

Open Document