The Analysis of Fylfot Sign

1308 Words6 Pages
The Analysis of Fylfot Sign From the ancient times people all over the world had used different types of visual signs. In the times before Christ, they used visual signs as a special language; nowadays scientists still try to differentiate their messages. In all times signs were used as protection from evil spirits and for calling the divine grace. The sign can also be called a symbol. According to Longman Dictionary of Contemporary Language the word “symbol” means: “a piece of paper, metal, or wood with words or a picture that gives people information, warnings, or instructions”. If to look deeply into the meaning of this word, the word “symbol” is derived from the ancient Greek symballein, meaning to throw together. Its figurative use originated in the custom of breaking a clay tablet to mark the conclusion of a contract or agreement would be given one of the broken pieces, so that when they reconvened the pieces could be fitted together like a jigsaw. The pieces each of which identified one of the people involved were known as a symbola, so that a symbol not only represents something else but also hints at a missing “something”, an invisible part that is needed to achieve completion or wholeness. Whether consciously or unconsciously, the symbol carries the sense of joining things together to create a whole greater than the sum of its parts, as shades of meaning accumulate to produce a complex idea. A sign, on the other hand, may be understood as something that stands for, or points to, something else in a more literal way. A sign exists to convey information about a specific object or idea, while a symbol tends to trigger a series of perceptions, beliefs and emotional responses. It is quite clear that symbols and signs play a huge role in history; people were always looking for them, because they could give them a power and successes. Nowadays the Humanities
Open Document