Then you have some that are such big gamblers that they bet their homes, cars and empty their bank accounts to feed the addiction that they have. Within my research of ethical problems of gambling, I will discuss the definition of gambling, signs of a compulsive gambler, facts about gambling addictions. I will also go over how you can tell if a family member is suffering from gambling addictions, how gambling affects your close family and relationships, problems with internet gambling, the causes of pathological gambling and the treatment and interventions of gambling. I hope that the information given will help you or a close friend overcome this addiction. Gambling in the United States is against the Federal and state restrictions but it is the leading industry in this country by the amount of money involved and by the number of participants.
Gambling addiction, also known as compulsive gambling, has become a big issue in today’s society. It can vary from making a simple bet of a dollar with a friend to going to the casinos and putting hundreds to thousands of dollars into the machines to play “games”. While most people are at it for fun, there are people that do it because they think they need to (problem gambling). These people will do anything they can in order to gamble, which can lead to negative consequences for him/herself and the community. As of now, there are only two states that do not allow any type of gambling.
Gambling Gambling is an issue that gains lots of attention because of the controversy surrounding it. There are supporters for and again this multi-billion-dollar industry. Gambling seems like abnormal part of society for many, but others it is viewed as a destructive force ruining a person and their relationships. Since we live in a liberal society we should be able to spend or wealth and time however we want. However, there exist different types of gambling.
It seems to be a legal blunder that is very straight forward, but becomes a heated debate. It begins with the argument should we prosecute a gamer for stealing via the virtual world? Alex Weiss is correct in saying that prosecution for virtual theft is wrong in the scheme of things, because each player reacts differently to behaviors. Even though a person is a “raider” in a game, it doesn’t make them a criminal in the real world. Weiss opens up his article with, “As a reformed online gaming thief, this ruling makes no sense to me.
Drinking and driving is very dangerous and many people have their lives shattered and ruined because of drunk drivers. That is why it is becoming socially unacceptable. People are finally starting to realize how dangerous this can really be. With the help of new laws, and continued hard work, the number of drinking and driving accidents should be very little in the future. Anyone that is caught while intoxicated should never have the right to drive again.
Second, the author addresses the prohibitionist argument that illegal drugs cause harm to people around the user as well. Huemer agrees that drugs have the potential to ruin a user’s life whether it be laziness, poor communication with others, or not taking pride in one’s work. He states that drug use only has a chance of causing one to behave in these ways. There are people all over the world that voluntarily behave in these ways without the use of drugs. Should these people be arrested for being losers?
He explained with the point with the idea that sport is about creating extraordinary moments and drug taking would simply be cheating. He explained that drugs have long term effects and can cause excessive damage to the body. Olivier then stated a very good point for the argument against drug taking for sports: that sports will be all about money and not talent. The richest individuals will be better than the ones who cannot afford it. Both debaters used imagery to convey characters demonstrating either sides of the argument.
Customs officers are expected to do their job and put a stop to the drug trafficking but the temptation of making some extra money may be extremely strong. Money is the root of all evil and a lot of people are very selfish. For an example, they know the effects drugs have on a society as a whole but if the price is high enough, they may turn their head and allow the drugs to be brought in. Not only is this wrong, it is damaging to everyone. “It is believed that the loss of the drug trafficking industry in Mexico would cause that country’s economy to shrink by over 63 percent” (DrugAbuse.net, (2012), para.
However, that is not the case as gambling is a compulsion that can have devastating consequences for all those involved. Gambling addiction can lead to serious economic, social, and health problems such as unemployment, severe debt or bankruptcy, estranged relationships, and clinical depression, anxiety, or suicide. First off, gambling may result in a great payout but does carry the risk of tremendous financial burden that could lead to massive debt, unemployment, and filing for bankruptcy. Whenever the opportunity to win big amounts of money arises, the temptation to go all in is tremendous. The major downside, however, is that one could lose it all in an instant.
Prostitution, labeled as a victimless crime, is basically the exchange of money or favors for sexual activity between consenting adults, this type of “victimless” crime is considered illegal in the United States and is punishable by heavy fines or imprisonment of up to ten years, sometimes up to 30 if one party is not of legal age. Prostitution should stay illegal, aside from the basic morality of the situation, prostitution can bring on a whole list of problems for U.S. citizens if allowed to be legalized. To sell ones body in exchange for mony or favors is the choice of an individual, even if the act itself is illegal. But to create a law, in the hopes of protecting citizens, is the job of the government or, when it comes down to it, the majority of the public. The argument that a person has the right to sell their body, for whatever means, and that prostitution should be legalized is not, in fact, very justifiable.