Sonnet 130 New Criticism

860 Words4 Pages
New Criticism of Sonnet 130 Though the sonnet is primarily known as a tool of seduction, readers may think otherwise when reading William Shakespeare’s Sonnet 130. The piece trades the traditional flattering language of a sonnet for a less charming and too honest approach. With the use of metaphor, simile, circumlocution, and paradox, Shakespeare displays his impeccable ability to seduce by proving he can successfully woo his mistress with nothing but insult and slander. One very noticeable feature of Sonnet 130 is the consistent use of comparison throughout the poem. The speaker bounces back and forth between simile and metaphor to create a specific illustration for readers to envision. A typical sonnet line would commonly express how a woman is as beautiful as the aspects of nature. Shakespeare may not use these similes and metaphors in the typical way, but he does succeed in displaying a vivid description of his apparently less than enticing mistress. The audience learns that this woman’s eyes do not look “like the sun” (1), and that even the fair pink hue of coral is “far more red” (2) than the color of her lips. He does not give descriptions of alluring scents or shiny hair, but instead describes putrid breath that “reeks” (8) and “black wires” (4) that grow in her hair’s place. Sonnet 130 certainly uses comparisons to nature, and though it seems that he is attempting to initially revolt his mistress instead of alluring her, the offending comparisons ultimately strengthen Shakespeare’s master plan. In order to emphasize the importance of the comparisons in the sonnet, Shakespeare uses circumlocution to elongate each sentence. Instead of a simple phrase that could clearly explain the color of her lips or the heaviness of her footsteps, each description is carefully compiled to allow them extra importance. Her lips are not just pale, but are pale in
Open Document