Grand Canyon JUS 110 MOD 6 DQ 1 How does the motivation of a serial killer differ from that of a terrorist? Grand Canyon JUS 110 MOD 6 DQ 2 Should different types of rape receive different punishments? For example, should someone who rapes a stranger be punished differently or more severely than someone who is convicted of raping a spouse or convicted of date rape? Why or why not? Grand Canyon JUS 110 MOD 7 DQ 1 Can social structure theories be used to explain white-collar crimes?
Abstract This paper will explore and discuss the difference in opinion regarding crime and who should be held accountable for criminal activity. The views of social responsibility and social problems will be examined, along with the perspectives that each holds to justify their belief. Theories such as Determinate Sentencing that holds the value of social responsibility in response to crime, and also the Constructionist theory that places that blame on society as to why a person commits a crime. In the end I believe that Social/Individual responsibility is the most appropriate way to approach crime. Perspectives of Social Problems and Social Responsibility Within criminology there has been multiple theories suggested to explain the numerous motives behind why crime exists in our world.
Los Angeles County and Racial Discrimination Does one single race commit more crime than any other? The idea seems true because the Los Angeles County Police Department uses race as a factor in detecting crime. Although classifying individuals by their skin tone seems wrong, in some cases the reasons are justified. For example, the country had to racially profile all people of Middle-Eastern descent to be a terrorist after September eleven. This classification makes sense because if crime is caused by terrorists; terrorist will cause crimes.
First and for most, to be able to identify the suspect and be able to contact them for further information or hearing information we must obtain their personal information. The other reason police get certain specific information form suspects is for statistical purposes. They use the FBI’s uniform crime report to form probabilities of which races were most likely to commit which crimes, where are they going to commit those crimes and what time of day will they possible commit them. The problem with race when determining guilt or innocence or whether to adjudicate a juvenile is that no matter what the crime when it comes to minorities most feel they are treated unfairly. They think that they system has it in for them and is biased to their ethnicity.
This helps to define why some individuals with similar strains commit crimes and why others chose legal manners in which they deal with their strains and emotions. General Strain Theory can help to explain any act that is considered deviant by society, and carries with it some sort of punishment, either formally or informally (Agnew, 2006). Failure to achieve
The victim may lie in order to try and gain sympathy or favor. I believe the best method of collecting crime data is to ask the victim what happened at different times, being asked by different people. The Uniform Crime Report (or also known as UCR) is used for measuring official crime data the UCR began in 1929. The Uniform Crime Report (or also known as UCR) Began by Federal Bureau of Investigation (or also known as “The FBI”) but Information is based on arrests made. These reports include Part I offenses: violent and property crimes.
Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime. (21 marks) “Crimes are those actions deemed so disturbing to citizens of disruptive to society as to justify state intervention.” Pease (2002). Crime is any act which breaks the laws of society. For example, murder or rape. Deviance, on the other hand, is behaviour which moves away from conventional norms and values such as burping and farting in public.
Hate crimes penalties are greater than other crimes because of two main reasons first is that they are target to communities and second the individual who commit hate crime need to have greater culpability then those who commit a regular crime, based on those two reasons legislating a hate crime on character the liberal society might lose of its features. In this paper I will engage and explain Hurd’s view with taking in consideration three different points of view. The first one is the increased penalties for hate crimes are in fact justifiable, the second one is hate crimes
(Suggesting an impulsive, possibly psychotic killer) | Was the crime staged to mislead the police? | What motivations are revealed by details such as;a) Cause of death b) Location of wounds c) Position of body | What racial group did the killer belong to? | What was the gender of the offender? | What was the age range of the offender? | What was the marital status of the offender?
Racial and Ethnic Profiling by Law Enforcement Name: Institutional affiliation: Racial and Ethnic Profiling by Law Enforcement Introduction Racial and ethnic profiling is the use of ethnic, racial, religious or national characteristics as a way of isolating people for security or identity checks. It is a practice whereby security, intelligence and law enforcement officers make decisions about their suspicions of a person based on the person’s race or ethnicity rather than reasonable suspicion (Ethan, 2013). There have been raging debates as to whether racial and ethnic profiling should be used. People who support racial and ethnic profiling argue that certain ethnicities or races are more likely to commit crime as compared to other groups. They claim that profiling is then not about race or ethnicity but about carrying out the most proficient fighting operations to target crime.