The beatitudes teach us basic life skills about how we should act towards one another, encouraging us to treat others with respect, compassion, generosity and justice. If we succeed and live the way Jesus showed us to, which is by showing the values of the beatitudes, we will be rewarded in heaven and will live for eternity with God. The statement, “Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” basically means standing up for what you believe in, what you know is right and facing the consequences with the choices you decide to take forward. It is about fighting for what is good and what is going to make this world better. If we are able to do this, God will take note of our faithfulness by rewarding us with eternal life with him in heaven.
It does not settle the west. It does not educate.” Thoreau also uses powerful imagery in order to persuade his readers towards his ideals. He believed that one must be conscious of the laws they choose to obey and disobey, whether or not they are in the minority. The people should not be tricked into believing that neither the government nor the majority will know what is right and what is wrong. Instead, Thoreau remarks that it is up to every man to decide for himself what is right based on his moral standards and ethics.
Mencken states that this is another point that is uncertain and can be argued. Those who are for capital punishment assume that the only reason capital punishment is wanted is to deter crime. This is in fact, not true. It is obviously one of the aims of punishment but not the only one. “They believe that we simply hang or electrocute A in order to alarm B so he will not kill C” (Mencken 145).
Their focus is on the control factors that prevent people from committing criminal or delinquent acts (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990; Hirschi, 1969; Nye, 1958; Reckless, 1967; Reiss, 1951; and Sykes & Matza, 1957). People obey the law because they are responding to appropriate social controls. People who violate the law do so because their social controls are not working or their bonds to law-abiding people have been broken or were never developed (Reiss, 1951). The question becomes not how to prevent criminal behavior, but how to get people to engage in law-abiding behavior. This paper examines a variety of approaches by social control theorists.
The white moderate believes that you should follow every law no matter it be just or unjust, whereas all laws making segregation legal are considered unjust, in order to hide from tension and keep order in the community. King states that tension is a “necessary phase of the transition from an obnoxious negative peace” (King 7). In order to change the status quo, tension needs to be present and directly in front of the eyes of the general public. Nonviolent direct action in terms of the civil rights movement can also be defined as civil disobedience: purposefully disobeying unjust segregation laws in a manner of nonviolence. In the letter, King states that “In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification; and direct action” (King 2).
James Osumah Mr. Williams Essay Re-Write In the article Frank Trippett makes Valid and truthful accusations. There is only social order when everyone is following the laws. Even the minor laws are important. If you break minor laws you’ll just continue to break more and more laws. We can liken this to the domino effect when you break smaller laws you’ll eventually break bigger ones.
But also that it is of equal importance to justify one’s actions when thought of doing nothing wrong. Socrates gives the perfect example of this in the Crito, when stating “in war and in law courts, and everywhere else, do whatever your city or father land commands or else persuade it as to what is really just”(51b-c). Socrates addresses both the importance of law and self morality here. It is very important to follow the laws set in place, in fear that people need order. But all laws are made by man, and are therefore not perfect.
Peacemaking criminologists were concerned violence in our society. They believe we should not solve crime with crime. They argue that the way to end crime is to end suffering. They say that one way to get rid of crime is to have an equal distribution of resources. Peacemaking criminologists believe that punishments for crime need to be less repressive and have more reintegrative programs for responding and preventing crime.
That is why it creates paternalistic laws to protect life. However to protect us the government makes us may so much to accomplish this goal. I would rather make my own decision to be safe. They are limiting my freedom in so many ways. If I do no put my seatbelt on me would get a ticket.
ASSUMPTIONS OF ETHICS ASSUMPTION- Are fundamental beliefs or statements that are accepted to be true without the burden of proving or of proof. COMMON ASSUMPTION ABOUT ETHICS Here are a variety of statements that represent widely accepted assumptions considered part of behaving, deciding, and acting ethically. . We will be other-regarding (take the welfare-(kapakanan) of others into account-(consider) .We will have good intentions in all acts that affect others .We will seek ways to promote the “good society” and the “good life” .We will “do no harm” (by non-, mis-, or mal-feasance) .We will not force someone to do something against their will .We will respect the autonomy (freedom to chose) of others .We will relieve the suffering of others (aide the suffering-help the needy) .We will put the basic needs of others ahead of our own wants (do unto…) .We will seek and choose the options that best balance duties, consequences, feasibility, and circumstances when considering the good .These rules will take precedence over other rules TWO MOST IMPORTANT AND MOST COMMON ASSUMPTION IN ETHICS First, that man is a rational being. This means that the man is a rational and acts with purpose, unlike brutes who merely act out of instinct and reflex.