But this will entirely change if these people get a job because they can’t rely on food stamps forever. Roughly 85% of the food stamps recipients are single parent homes so it will be hard to go to your job if you have a young child. But Republicans have proposed to spend 1 billion dollars toward child care. People might say what’s the point of working is if you have food on the table. But there is a point because if people start working they can be independent.
Choosing to order a healthier meal option at a restaurant is not equal to a home cooked meal made with fresh foods. Pollan says “obesity rates are inversely correlated with the amount of time spent on food preparation” and goes on to say “research supports the idea that cooking is a better predictor of a healthful diet than social class” (106). Economics, education, and culture may very well play a part in how and what we eat but if we actually cook the food we eat is ultimately a larger indicator of our physical health. Parents who feed
The government should have regulation on the fast food industry. Healthily eating actives want the government to tax sugary sodas. Health insurance is spending millions of dollars. | Body Paragraph #: 1 Topic Sentence Idea | The government has some point to want to have regulations on what we eat. | Evidence | The government has given us the choice to eat what we want but we tend not to eat healthier but only junk food.
The purpose of this essay is to see if government should add more tax to fast food to control obesity. This will help hospitals get more money to help solve cancer, make obese people smaller, let people live longer, spend less money, and allows people to travel better by adding more tax. When people eat junk food they are likely to die faster. If we go to fast food restaurants we are more likely to become obese. If government adds more tax people would spend less money.
The term “Universal Healthcare” refers to equal health coverage for all residents of a nation “funded by the government under [a] single-payer system” (Cummings). The United States currently does not utilize universal healthcare; its health insurance is provided mainly through employers and by private companies. This consumer-driven system is harmful to the residents of the United States who are unemployed and cannot afford expensive private insurance. It also facilitates the need for welfare and, even then, those on public assistance receive a lower quality of care. Universal Healthcare would lower the mortality rate in the United States by solving the problem of the uninsured and the underinsured, as well as halt rising healthcare costs in the U.S.
In this essay, by Radley Balko, he refers to America’s approach at controlling obesity. He talks about the government trying to regulate menus and meals. He raises a good point in saying that the government getting involved with what we can eat, makes it feel like it’s not our responsibility to regulate our own eating habits. He also raises the point that America has taxes to assist those who are out of shape, but everyone is required to pay, irrelevant to their physical build. He is considered to be a liberal, which supports the fact that he would disagree with government regulating what food people eat to prevent obesity.
Yes, Wal-Mart provides many uneducated Americans with job however it isn’t a job from which can make livable wage. Wal-Mart pays all their employees besides management minimum wage. With prices on the rise like they are today it is hard for a person to live off minimum wage which is currently 7 dollars and 25 cents in New York. Not to mention if you have kids it is virtually impossible to live off minimum wage and if you do it’s an unpleasing struggle. Another problem is that there is no growth in your field if you work at Wal-Mart.
They could make laws that would protect the citizens from harmful diseases caused by unhealthy foods as well as saving money on healthcare to provide for the people that cannot afford to pay for the healthcare they need for the diseases. This is why the American Government should regulate the diets of Americans. One of the main reasons the Government should regulate diets is because of the overwhelming amount of people that are obese or over-weight, especially with the number of children that are having these problems and the parents are not doing anything about it. “Surgeon General Regina says with the Government interjecting and making some decisions on not what to eat, but how the food is made and how much they eat, America as a whole would start to become a more fit country” (Regina). Surgeon General Kooper also says, “Obesity is one of the most prevalent diet-related problems in the United States” (Kooper 277).
Daniel Weintraub, in his article, "The battle against fast food begins in the home", states that parents are to blame for childhood obesity. The essence of Weintraub's argument is that it is the parents responsibility not the government, nor are the fast food companies bound to teach kids how to eat healthy and how to say active. He also mentioned results of statistics made on social economic status and gender, which shows that more kids are overweight due to fast food restaurants, supersizing and lack of exercise. Weintraub refutes these findings by emphasizing how parents are responsible for what their kids eat. As a result, his own recommendations include: limiting the consumption of sodas, junk food as well as avoiding a sedentary lifestyle.
They ask why the government tax rate is so high. Why do the tax payers have no choice but to accept the “free” public health care? How can the tax payers make sure that the health care service which they have obtained is worth the tax they have paid? They can choose to buy a cup of coffee, but they cannot choose to pay for health care services when they need them because they paid for them through taxes ahead of time. The