Horrors Of War Essay

501 Words3 Pages
The article views the issue of the media showing the full horrors of war in a negative light, and rightfully so. I am against the media showing the full horrors of war, due to several reasons. First and foremost. showing excessive amounts of horror desensitizes the public to killing, extreme violence, and war. Whilst it may be argued that such coverage makes the public empathise with the victims of war, but even if the emotional impact of the war is felt by the public at first, the impact might lessen over time until war eventually becomes most inconsequential to them. A theory called narcotising dysfunction says that the more an individual is inundated with (sensationalised) news about a certain horrifying topic, the more apathetic he becomes toward it. The individual starts substituting knowing about it for action against it. In other words, such coverage promotes as…show more content…
In Mogadishu in 1993, Somalia was at the precipice, and if it was pushed just enough it would descend into a crisis that could potentially shake millions of lives. A relatively small US task force was involved in trying to take out a warlord whose increasing influence was having massive repercussions on the nature of the civil war, and who was at the heart of many of the tragedies going on in Somalia. After Somalis shot down two helicopters, and damaged three more, the death toll for the Americans was 18. The visceral reaction of the American people to the sensationalised reports about horrors of war that the media beamed across the country was so large that it forced the government to withdraw, and they could no longer prevent the humanitarian crisis that has since developed in Somalia. So my second point is that showing the full horrors of war evokes a strong emotional response from the people instead of a thoughtful one and this may stop necessary

More about Horrors Of War Essay

Open Document