Should Juveniles Be Charged as Adults in Criminal Cases

978 Words4 Pages
SHOULD JUVENILES BE CHARGED AS ADULTS IN CRIMINAL CASES TRINA LEVESQUE POST UNIVERSITY Abstract In 1984 in Butte Mt, two boys (boys simply because of their age) Michael Horvath age 15 and Ted Gibson age 14, committed some unspeakable acts. Michael and Ted had brutally taken the lives of their mothers as well as the life of Ted’s 16 year old sister. These two were sentenced to a juvenile detention facility until the age of 21, after which their juvenile records were sealed and they were able to go on with their lives as if it never happened. I feel that justice was not served for the victims. After this heinous act the laws of MT were swiftly changed to charge juveniles as adults if they commit an adult crime. I believe that if a juvenile can commit the crime then the juvenile can do the time. . As of June 2012, the federal government and 28 states have adopted the “life-without-parole term mandatory” (Kendall, B. 2012 Wall Street Journal) for juveniles convicted of murder in adult court. Of course we would not want to sentence a 15 year old to “life-without-parole” if the circumstances did not warrant it. The 8th Amendment, states cruel and unusual punishment is unconstitutional. Studies done by (The Washington Post, 2007) state “that children incarcerated in adult jails are more likely to be arrested again and commit graver new offenses”. Juveniles in adult correctional facilities are not offered any chance at the rehabilitation tools or schooling that is part of a rigorous curriculum in a juvenile facility. Neurological research (2005 Supreme Court decision to take away capital punishment for juveniles) indicates that a juvenile’s brain development to manage moral reasoning and impulse control is not fully developed until the person reaches his or her early to mid-20s. Juveniles need structuring, counseling and

More about Should Juveniles Be Charged as Adults in Criminal Cases

Open Document