Separation Of Power Essay

996 Words4 Pages
Option 1: a bicameral, separation of powers form of representative democracy in a federal system A mob can be defined as “a crowd bent on or engaged in lawless activity”, it can also be looked at as “the common people, the masses; the populace”. What happens when you put the masses in control of writing there own acts of laws or legislation? Sooner or later they become the original definition “a disorderly crowd of people”. There was a reason the original founding fathers chose to use the separation of powers, to leave the power in one groups hand be that the masses or the judges there is no one to check them. We’ve learned from mistakes in the past that leaving branches unchecked lead to corruption and other deep seeded problems. For…show more content…
Putting the power in the hands of the masses it cause much more harm than good due to the fact that people in general are out to further themselves and it usually at the cost of others. Keeping the powers separate was how they were written is important in the stability of the United States, if we can overthrow something as influential as Separation of Powers it could very well lead down a slippery slope. James Q. Wilson and John J. DiIulio, Jr., American Government, The Essentials, 11th ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2008), David S. Broder, “Dangerous Initiatives; A Snake in the Grass Roots,” The Washington Post, March 26, 2000, http://www.proquest.com. James Q. Wilson and John J. DiIulio, Jr., American Government, The Essentials, 11th ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2008), Gordon S. Wood, The Creation of the American Republic 1776-1787 (Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1969), David S. Broder, “Dangerous Initiatives; A Snake in the Grass Roots,” The Washington Post, March 26, 2000,

More about Separation Of Power Essay

Open Document