Rhetorical Analysis on “Better Energy”

1274 Words6 Pages
Darien Sorensen Professor Potratz English 100 9 October 2009 Rhetorical Analysis on “Better Energy” Gwyneth Cravens addresses the issue of the use of nuclear energy in her article “Better Energy”. She starts off by introducing James Lovelock, who is a prominent figure in the green movement, but four years before she wrote her article, he upset his fans by endorsing the use of nuclear energy. She goes on to explain how the use of nuclear energy will be able to decrease the threat of global warming. She claims that nuclear energy is the only way to get the amount of energy that is needed, without critically hurting the environment. Through out her article Cravens highlights the environmental benefits of nuclear energy. While Cravens effectively reaches to her audience and gives credibility to her article, which fortifies her argument, she ultimately diminishes her strength with her failure to completely address some key issues about nuclear energy Through her ethos Cravens’ effective use of ethos gives her the creditability needed for people to listen to what she is saying. She starts off by showing her on credentials for writing this article. She reflects on how, through the research for her book, Power to Save the World: The Truth About Nuclear Energy, she changed her mind from opposing nuclear energy to endorsing it. By giving her readers this information, she is showing that she has done in depth research on the topic of nuclear energy, so they can trust her to give them correct information. This proves that her change of mind came from a well-educated and researched decision, which again proves that she knows a lot about what she is writing. Her research can be shown through out her entire article. She also gives credit to her article by quoting prominent environmentalist, James Lovelock. Through using him, she is building up proof that nuclear
Open Document