If the age limit was lowered the alcohol would no longer be a forbidden, therefore it would not be as appealing as it would normally. When it is forbidden, such as right now, it makes teens desire it even more and gives them a sort of satisfaction, either because the person actually sold it to them using a fake ID, or because they are doing something against the law and being disobedient. Either way, being forbidden from something makes it that much more exciting. For example, you are underage but you have acquired a fake id stating you are 18 or 21 when in reality you are 16 or so, when you go to a club you will definitely be more excited that you got in when you really shouldn't have been
Teens will not have the thrill of breaking the law. It will just seem like a thing people do, but in moderation. Teens find it thrilling to do something that's forbidden. Take it from me, I am a 17 year old teenager. When someone tells me not to do something, it makes me want to do it more.
Since teenagers are immature to make their own decision, it is vital for adults to inculcate a correct attitude towards drinking. Nevertheless, it seems that nowadays many schools and parents only focus teenagers’ academic development. They neglect teaching youngsters with a sense of individual responsibility after drinking. Because of ignorance and lack of education from adults, teenagers have not take health issues into account after drinking harder alcohol. As a result, the problem of alcohol abuse and drinking deaths become graver among college students.
As you can see, the seriousness of alcoholism is by far worse than what most teenagers may think it is. Lowering the drinking age that the law requires in California will not make anything more useful. Drinking at a young age could be harmful towards you, your brain, and also to others. Permitting a minor to use alcohol will also increase the percentage
Legal Drinking Age Should Not Be Below eighteen There has been a huge debate in the past years between people whether the legal drinking age should be lowered to eighteen or not. The people who agree to that argue that if a young adult is old enough to go to war and vote, he should have the power to drink alcoholic beverages. They also site Europe as an example of a lower drinking age that works, and there are even some organizations that suggest that the illegality of alcohol makes it more alluring, that’s why we must allow our teenage individuals to drink alcohol. As for the disagreeing party, they state that those in their late teens and early twenties are formative years that build character and leadership in the community, and that individuals
More liquor will be sold to the patrons, which will increase the amount of money the government can make. An alternative policy is to legalize drinking but drive up the monetary price though new taxes. As long as young adults' alcohol demand is at least somewhat responsive to price, taxation can reduce consumption by as much as the current legal drinking age of twenty-one does. (Donald Kenkel, Acess my Library,3) If eighteen year olds do not have legal access to even a beer in a public place, they are ill equipped to deal with the responsibilities that come with drinking when they do have the right. Local business will also do better by being able to sell alcohol to more people as well.
College students should take into account of their lives as they are tossing back indigenous amounts of liquor. A heavy amount of liquor consumed in a short period is not good on the body or the mind. It is highly unlikely that college students are able to quit binge drinking at the sight of more people around them doing the same things. Prevention of this horrific trend should have been laid to rest ages ago but yet colleges have let it grow substantially to where it is almost impossible to stop or control. As adults and parents, we need to put an end to the constant self destructive ways of our youth and future
Positive Effects of a Lower Drinking Age in America Arguments about the United States drinking age are commonly discussed. The law is thought of by some as a great way to keep young adults out of trouble, but by others it is thought to be an unsuccessful law that has only brought harm to many young adults. Not enough people are taking action in changing the drinking age to eighteen, which may be because Americans feel it is not necessary or because American citizens have not thought into full detail about all of the positive effects a lower drinking age could have. The United States Federal Government believes that citizens under twenty one years of age are not fully developed and consuming alcohol can harm their development, but America has the highest drinking age in the world. Other countries with low drinking ages do not have major health problems concerning alcohol and their young adults, thus proving alcohol is not necessarily unhealthy for developing young adults.
Some argue that the legal drinking age in PA should be lowered to 18 years old. Although the argument is very debatable, the drinking age should remain at 21 years old. For 18 year olds, they are experiencing a whole new world, consisting of more freedom, considering the curfew extension and the ability to buy cigarettes along with many other things. But on top of all of the new freedom, comes many responsibilities, such responsibilities that adults tend to not be able to handle. Keeping the drinking age as is will keep the young adults safe, healthy and in the long run, teach them responsibility.
As a result, it wouldn’t solve the whole problem of underage drinking, but it would be an important step in the correct direction to help young adults. As we have seen, the legal drinking age in the USA should be lowered to 18. We already recognize 18 year olds as responsible adults that can benefit the society in many different ways. Also, lowering the legal drinking age to 18 would be consistent with the freedom that supposedly every single habitant in the United States has. Additionally, people at 18 are mature enough to decide what is correct in their own lives with the help of the government and