While theft and low income consumers bring the possibility of providing only moderate revenue gains, if not a loss, operating in impoverished areas can also be a source of growing potential for the business. Many companies advertise philanthropic missions, such as donating to charities every year or helping to provide for the families of their employees. While these are messages that consumers hear, a more powerful message can be the one that the consumers themselves see. Rather than closing down those stores, Company Q should focus on the reasons for the high crime, and offer ways to reduce that crime rate. Offering work programs that help prepare young people for management or skilled positions is a good way to take crime off of the streets while showing to the community that the business cares about the welfare of the population.
Over the past few years, our economy has faced unthinkable challenges including millions upon millions of Americans losing or has lost their jobs. For the past two years the unemployment rate has average around nine percent. Among the 26 million who are unemployed, at least seven million individuals are working illegally in the United States. Some believe that legal workers have to compete with illegal immigrants for scarce jobs. Good news is, congress have come up with a program that will eliminate unauthorized employment.
Due to the biased position of the government favoring “suitable” genres of art, limits are placed on the creativity of artwork. By limiting the area artists are able to work in, further progression in developing new styles of art is halted. Artists pour their souls into sculptures and paintings, and if deemed unsuitable by the government, the artists have wasted countless hours perfecting their work for nothing. Costs of creating different styles of art are high, and many artists work side-jobs just to fund their art. Without the $102,608,648 given to the NEA to fund art programs (Source F), many artists would become broke and lose the ability to create the art they hold so dear.
This opposition is valid however; there is a way to prevent this risk on employers. The article Criminal Recidivism: Why it Hurts Everyone, shows that New Haven, Connecticut has found the answer to this opposition. Their government only allows employers to perform a background check on potential employees after a job offer has been accepted. The employer can only refuse the job offer if the background check shows that the employee’s criminal past could interfere with the job offered to them. A person convicted of embezzlement would be a cause of concern if the job offer was for a payroll department but not if it was for road construction (par.
Some of the current sources of stress for the criminal justice professional are, long hours and not enough family time with loved ones. I do believe that the agencies provide adequate assistance with managing occupational stressors; they are just not explored and used enough by the individuals that need them. I believe the politics of corruption exists within the field of criminal justice. I say that because it seems that if you are wealthy strings can be pulled for you and u can afford the best lawyers, and u could be guilty but you will get off because you or your family are well off. On the other hand there that middle class of poor that knows nothing about the system or doesn’t have the resources to get a good lawyer they are screwed completely ruin your life and affecting some people around you.
I don’t think the people should be able to get off that easy simply because of a legal mishap and in fact disgusts me that his has happens numerous times every year. If we could change this I believe it would have an extremely positive impact on our society and make it even more difficult for criminals to get off unpunished. References Tankebe, J. (2009). Policing, procedural fairness and public behavior: a review and critique.
Yes, an individual should be punished for their crimes but the effects of a felony conviction should not include or affect that person’s right to vote, finding employment, or the pursuance of a higher education. According to Olivares, Burton, and Cullen (1996) upon release these offenders also deal with stigmas, loss of job opportunities, friendships, family relationships, and denial of civil rights. When it comes to the loss of job opportunities, a recent study has shown that most employers have hired at least one person with a felony conviction (Sawnson, Langfitt-Reese & Bond, 2012). Employers encourage job seekers with criminal records to be honest and willing to discuss their involvement with the justice system. Most employers did not have strict policies concerning hiring criminals and this is a plus.
The last disadvantage I think will be a problem to the Dodge Clinic is employees seeking employment elsewhere because they do not feel there job is secure. You may have employees quit and go work for the competition because they feel that they are not valued enough. That can cause a chain reaction and a lot of other employees will
In this article, several there were examples of fear making victims rethink their daily routines and activities and to take extra pre-cautions to be safer. This in turn makes it harder for offenders to find and prey on victims. This type of action is called target hardening. According to the article, society does not systematically collect data. The data on fear that is collected is generally very old.
While wage, sexual gender, racial, ethnic, and employment discrimination are major offenders of one’s moral rights as a citizen, language discrimination is the least known type of discrimination. It is the silent type of discrimination. This could be because most minorities are uneducated and feel threatened if they complain. Language discrimination occurs when a person is not treated the same because of their native language or other characteristics of that person’s speech. One example of this would be when the employee does not speak English and it is company policy.