Psychological Mindedness, Coping and Psychopathology

693 Words3 Pages
Abstract Recently, study in the area of psychological intervention has found psychological mindedness (PM) as a construct that relates to coping styles and psychopathology. In order to explore the relationship in depth, students enrolled in a course in psychology were asked to complete an online survey that measured these constructs. Traits of psychopathology (depression and anxiety) were found to negatively correlate with task-focused coping, yet positively with emotion-focused coping. However, all constructs of PM formed a positive correlation with task-focused coping, while PM Insight had a negative correlation with emotion-focused coping, PM Interest and PM Other did not. These results suggest that in favour of psychological intervention, task-focused coping strategies are the more adaptive of coping strategies. It may also suggest that psychologically minded individuals may use more effectual coping strategies. Future research should aim in gathering a more representative sample of a non-clinical population and employ a measure more reliable than online surveys. The relationship between coping and psychopathology, both anxiety and depression, is centre of an immense amount of research (Endler & Parker, 1990; Hovanitz, 1986). Coping styles and the forms of psychopathology (depression and anxiety) have been found to be implicated in the measure of psychological mindedness (PM; Nyklicek, Poot, & Opstal, 2010; Nyklicek & Denollet, 2009). It is important to form a clear understanding in the manner of these relationships as they may contribute to psychological interventions and emotional insight (McCallum & Piper, 1990). Overall, PM is considered to be a valuable predictor of an individuals’ psychological wellbeing. PM is defined as a persons’ deliberate intent (interest) and ability (insight) to come to terms with and reflect upon their own psychological
Open Document