Assuming that young, petty lawbreakers may be deterred from braking laws, simply by introducing the possibility of a public flogging, has some flaws to it. Jacoby neglected to bring up, what I would call the perfect argument to this topic. People who already intentionally commit crimes in today’s American society are fully aware of the possible repercussions for their actions. Despite this knowledge they continue to commit crimes that could land them in jail. I could argue that even more crime could result in effect to fewer prisonable offences and more humane forms of corporal punishment.
Name: Institution: Course: Tutor: Date of submission: 3 Strikes Law Three Strikes Laws are acts that are passed by state governments in the U.S. It gives mandates to state courts to give life sentences to persons convicted of three or more severe criminal offenses. These acts became popular in the 1990s. Its intent is to ensure that there are longer prison sentences and bigger punishment for those committing felonies and those formerly convicted of severe offenses. It is aimed at the criminals who are not deterred by imprisonment and those who are not open to rehabilitation efforts.
I believe that convicted felons should be allowed to vote upon release from prison because they exercise good judgment: in addition, withholding their rights to vote would be a violation of the United States Voting Rights act of 1965 and the eighth amendment of the Constitution. I think that some, but not all ex-convicts should be allowed to reinstate their voting rights. This should be judged on a case by case basis according to the crime they committed. Also, it should be based on the magnitude and severity of their crime. At the very least, they should attend and complete a special designed program, go through a waiting period, and take a drug-screened testing regularly before they get their privileges restored.
Sentencing Sentencing Katie Miller CJA/314 Criminology February 10, 2013 Krista Hall Axia College/University of Phoenix There are many things that must be considered when presenting a Bill to increase sentencing. This particular Bill would double the sentence for armed robbery. At first glance, the Bill appears to be a good plan, but is it really? This report looks at many factors that would be influenced by this Bill. After considering these factors, a recommendation will be made on whether or not this Bill would really be beneficial.
Prison Term Policy recommendation Proposal CJA/314 04/25/12 Mr. Hewitt Prison Term Policy Recommendation Proposal As the criminologist advisor to a member of the Georgia State legislature, I was chosen to do research for the bill that would double the maximum prison term for anyone convicted of arm robbery. My boss knows it a popular bill but have concern whether it is a good one. My job is to make some recommendation in regards to if the bill is passed will it be beneficial to everyone in of Georgia. “The prison term policies are sentencing guidelines that are created by Congress and the State Legislature to provide judges with bases for sentencing those individuals found guilty of committing a crime to ensure that each person is treated equal without discrimination” (Sentencing guidelines, 2010). According, to the Uniform Crime Reporting Program it list these offenses robbery, forcible rape, and murder etc.
Basic rights are protected by criminal law. Once a person is convicted of committing a crime, those basic rights are taken away. Also, once the crime rate has gone up, or there are too many people doing the same crimes, for example gun violence, our basic rights can be changed and altered, so there are restrictions on the basic rights of citizens. The police and law enforcement systems are required to enforce criminal law. If any citizen tries to misuse his or her basic rights, or take away other citizens, law enforcement is required to take action on it.
With a personal crime you will have a perpetrator and a victim. Property crimes are just that, crimes against a piece of property where there is no use or threat of force against a person. The most common crime types are violent crimes, white collar and corporate crime, organized crime, and victimless crime. The first line of defense against crime lays with law enforcement personnel. get better grades Law enforcement is the first part of what makes up our criminal justice system.
The criminal justice system ensures that everyone that commits a crime is punished as a result of the crime they commit. The prison system (incapacitation) was initially developed to keep offenders off the streets thus preventing them from committing crimes in the community resulting in the reduction of crime rates. Capital punishment is also part of the prison system were it is carried out but, in society not everyone feels that criminals should receive the death penalty for a murder they committed. People also believe that capital punishment does not in any way deter future murders committed by other criminals. According to the article “The Death Penalty Does Not Deter Murder,” Hentoff says, “statistics [show] that the murder rate in states with the death penalty is higher than the murder rate in states without capital punishment.” (2004) On the other hand in the article “The Death Penalty Deters Murder,” the author says, “by removing a
Due Process In order for a crime to occur there are elements to a crime. First the act that was committed has to be justified illegal, next there has to be a victim, and a location the alleged crime occurred. Unless a police officer has witnessed the crime when it occurred, they cannot respond until the crime has been reported. After a crime has been reported then the criminal justice system begins. The person who allegedly committed the crime has just as many rights as the victim, and their rights start the moment the arrest is made.
RUNNING HEAD: NON-VIOLENT CRIMINALS SHOULD BE PUNISH WITH FINES Donta Archer 10/7/12 Professor Duffey English112 Title: Non-Violent Criminals Should Be Punish With Fines Non-violent crimes in the United States should be punished by fines rather than jail time because of recidivism, the cost, and restitution. The goal in today’s world should be stop sending so many non-violent criminals to federal prison. Federal prisoners have been convicted for violent crimes 13%, and overall almost 75% of the federal prison population is criminals serving time for non-violent offenses with no history of violence. Therefore the United States have federal prisons that have non-violent offenders and a few violent ones. Non-violent crimes should just be a punishable fine because it saves money for the United States and the federal prisons in the United States.