Philip Morris Case

481 Words2 Pages
1) What were the financial needs of PM and how did they relate to the business evolution of the company? Specifically, comment upon the firm’s acquisition strategy/ambitions. How would such a strategy be viewed today in light of activist investor pressures to create shareholder value? Philip Morris is a tobacco company that has successfully diversified, and is a producer of well-known brands of food and beer after multiple acquisitions. As the regulatory environment becomes more stringent in the United States, Philip Morris is aiming to diversify its strategy. Also, Philip Morris have accepted the fact that cigarette consumption will decrease and are left with no option but to raise the prices periodically to make up for declining volumes in the near future. Diversification would be one of great options that the Company would take and has been started from 1984 with reorganization, which enable to provide great flexibility. Based on Kraft acquisition, Philip Morris was able to make one step further to extend its spectrum to the food industry with General Foods Corporation acquisition. Since Philip Morris gradually tried to diversify its revenue spectrums and arranged acquisition of Kraft after the General Foods Corporation acquisition, the Company needed to secure financial resources to prevent any contingent or unfavorable environment. Based on PM’s financial status (audited FS as of 12/31/88), was able to endure Kraft acquisition, but needs additional financial resources. Philip Morris’ acquisition strategy for Kraft seems risky, but I believe that it was worthy to try. It seems as a very successful strategy to consider the result now, but Philip Morris took a risk to participate in the food industry, which was a significant transition for PM. PM appropriately caught what the synergy impacts are when it acquired well-known business brands such as Kraft Inc.
Open Document