Organ Vending and Donation Argumentative Essay

1404 Words6 Pages
Argumentative Essay: Organ Vendors As medical science has progressed over the years, the questions surrounding medical ethics have become increasingly complex. Specifically, inquiries have been raised about boundaries and rights that must be observed in the medical profession. An extension of these advancements and worries is the procedure of organ transplantation. A procedure that is now regularly practiced globally, it provides hope of a healthy but in most cases extended life for many patients. However as techniques have become more progressive, the list of patients awaiting organs has steadily increased. To give perspective, in the United States during the year of 2007, 25 328 transplantation procedures were performed, where at the end of 2007 there were 95,150 people still in needs of organs some with dire conditions (Caplan et al). Many different solutions have been proposed in order to rectify the shortage of organ availability, with compensation for organs becoming a widely supported solution. This in theory say proponents, can lead to an influx of organs into the system whether through cadavers or living providers, to an extent relieving the or eliminating the shortage completely. However, critics reject organ vending as a viable option, citing the abuse of human rights that would occur if the practice is legalized. Those in favour of financial gain for donors and their families claim that involving incentives would greatly increase the amount of organs available for use. The theory is that through compensation many possible organ providers would be prepared to come forward, where they are living or cadaver organ providers. Currently organs that are donated provide the sole resource of transplants that may occur in the world in legal terms. Therefore compensation may greatly increase the amount of organs available. However the negative aspect of

More about Organ Vending and Donation Argumentative Essay

Open Document