Oregon Death Penalty Research Paper

1509 Words7 Pages
Tina Carson Professor Brandon Writing 122 4 March 2013 Oregon Death Penalty Oregon currently has thirty-five inmates on death row awaiting execution. Another seventy-eight inmates are serving life without parole, and of that seventy-eight, one half have been incarcerated for over 40 years (Death penalty Info). Oregon wastes billions of dollars on our death penalty and the housing of death row inmates. Oregon would benefit from abolishing the death penalty or adapting stricter guidelines for use of the death penalty. In this paper we are going to look at the both sides of the argument. Which way would be most beneficial to our state? Oregon first adopted the death penalty in 1864, and public hangings were done until 1903 when Oregon…show more content…
It is estimated that Oregon’s tax payers, approximately pay one hundred and fifty dollars a day for their up keep (Death penalty info). This includes: housing, clothing, food, health cost, counseling, and education. The estimated time an individual spends on death row is approximately twenty year, which adds up to just over a million dollars per inmate. Now, multiply that by the twenty-seven that are sitting on death row. This is costing the tax payers twenty- nine million dollars over a twenty year period (Death Penalty Information Center). There is also the cost of the many appeals process that the inmate now goes through to try to overturn their conviction. This also cost the tax payers absorb anent amount of money. Now there is the issue of the inmates that are sitting with a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. This is costing the tax payers the same amount of money. What is the difference between the two when there is a moratorium on the death penalty in our state? There is none, other than life in prison without parole takes the responsibility off the Governor and the people who voted for the death penalty. The conviction of life without parole is handed down from either a jury or judge. The Governor is the one person who signs off on the execution of a death row…show more content…
It is estimated that it take a little over two million dollars a year to maintain the death chamber. Oregon has a chamber with a metal table that has arms that reach out to each side. Ankle, wrist and head straps to keep the inmate secure. There is a room just off of the death chamber with a two way mirror for the family or family of victims to witness the execution. There is a red phone and a blue phone on the wall. The red one is for the Governor to give the final go ahead, the blue one is for the state attorney general. There is a video camera that monitors everything (Killing Time). There also is three bottles of a lethal dose of poisons in a little room right off the chamber, that run down long tubes through the wall that are intravenously feed to the inmate. When the time is right the executioner presses a series of plungers sending a death cocktail to the inmate (Killing Time). The cost to maintain the cocktail alone is very high. This must be updated every so often due to drugs expiring. There is counseling for the executioner and other parties involved. Training is another high cost that must be taken in to play. The State of Oregon has not used the death chamber is over six thousand days (Killing Time). Tax payer’s money is being wasted to maintain something that is not being used. The main argument again is the money would be best used to help the states agencies already struggling. Police departments, jail, and

More about Oregon Death Penalty Research Paper

Open Document