Walmart sells many items at ridiculously low prices. They are able to offer low prices on their items due to an incredible mark-up on imported products. Especially in today's economy, the buck is the big winner. Everyone wants to save money, and they can do that by shopping at Walmart, where many items are the lowest price in town, even if it's only by a few pennies. But consumers aren't helping their fellow countryman earn his own living by buying these imported items.
Also, the quality of noise cancellation headphones vary a lot and the customers are willing to pay higher price for good product. In other words, this is not a commodity market as regular headphones. If company A can switch to produce noise-cancellation headphones with good quality at a reasonable cost, it can compete in the market and make a decent
Pepsi Co. keeps improving its products and make it more healthier and suitable for the customers. It has decreased the usage of sugar, fat and other unhealthy ingredients to make the products. These food items make not be the healthiest food out there, but it does satisfy the customer’s need with easy and is very convenient. The shareholders are also satisfied. Out of the total revenue, $10 billion comes from the healthy food section.
Because of their consistently low prices on products, their competitors have lowered their prices in order to compete with Wal-Mart. In turn, this has driven overall prices down. Wal-Mart has also created many new jobs and increased tax revenues. Businesses that are located next to Wal-Mart stores have also benefited from them because customers who are shopping at Wal-Mart will stop at other businesses before or after shopping at Wal-Mart ("Walmartstores.com: Economic Opportunity"). Because of the impact Wal-Mart has had not only on the retail industry in the United States, but also globally, I think it is safe to say that Wal-Mart is a very secure company.
I believe whole-heartedly that government intervention as well as taxation should be justified when these industries are not providing optimal amount of a good for society’s well-being. When a tax is put on someone’s favorite soda, they are either going to buy a similar drink that is untaxed or not buy the drink at all. Typically, the body does not account for liquid calories as much as it does food calories, therefore making it easier to drink more sugared drinks. Usually people do not to feel full from a sugary drink, which makes it less likely to buy foods that will replace the taxed beverage. They would be more likely to drink one or two more cans of soda rather than eating a snack or a full meal.
PepsiCo has shown the best current ratio and is able to pay off their debts, which Coca-Cola does not have that and is struggling to pay off their debts. However, Coca-Cola has a higher retained earnings percentage, which means that it is able to have funds available for future growth of the company. The hope for both companies is to provide their financial statement with better information presented over their competitor giving the ability to earn more investors. PepsiCo and Coca-Cola do not need to be at war with each other as they have what it takes to get people to use both products, no matter what. Keep in mind, that it is the people’s choice whether or not to support a company and decide whether to invest in the company not competing against each
In the short run, Kudler was able to maximize its profits and minimized losses. They were making profits because they were producing quantity where marginal revenue was equal to marginal cost and charged prices based on their demand curve. The demand for their goods was very high at first because they had little competition. Another positive effect of a monopolistic competition is that it promotes product variety and improvement. When Kudler makes business improvements, it causes their competitors to either imitate them or get out of the business.
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc 1) How would you characterize the energy beverage category, competitors, consumers, channels, and DPSG’s category participation in late 2007? The characteristic of the energy beverage category 2007 is that market was growing slow. Today market is also small and dominant by Red Bull because Red Bull was one of the first energy drinks. Being one of the first in market was huge advantage for Red Bull over competitors. Moreover, in the late 2007 the market was still growing up with variety kinds of energy beverage products.
As known that Costco is focusing on high quality of merchandises at relatively low prices, they have one condition in order to purchase merchandises at low prices, which is number of purchases. For example, to have one product that is cheaper than competitors they have to purchase more from original manufacturers. Therefore, Costco realized that they have to keep the sales volume to be high so they are still able to maintain this advantage. Because of this, they try to keep their slogan in customer minds that Costco has lower prices and they try to same membership money. However, there is a problem that Costco has to deal with is that their profits mostly from its membership fees instead its net income.
A positive effect of Kudler Fine Foods in a monopolistic market structure is that they lead in the market and can increase competition between companies and make massive profits by setting higher prices (Colander, 2010). An advantage of a monopolistic competition structure is the ability to set and manipulate product pricing with little consequence because of their strong product differentiation. A disadvantage of a monopolistic competition market is product differentiation can generate unnecessary waste, and advertising can also be considered