He illustrates that the mercy of helping many people may make catastrophes occur. In addition, the author highlights that prosperity people gaining is the exchange of dwindling of the natural resources from the earth. Moreover, he uses the yearly increasing population as an example implying that people should not share the resource to the poor people. Hardin identifies that the population in the poor countries is a huge global problem because the reproduction isn’t under control of the government. He logically acknowledges that mutual ruin will occur inevitably because people would like to share resources with others for being humane.
In addition, without simple necessities, like machines, several un-needed death occur. Our privatized medicine would be better if we did not change it to socialized medicine because of the negative effects that would take place. If you were to introduce socialized medicine to America, there would be several disadvantages. The disadvantages would have such a severe and negative change that would affect the economics of everyday life of normal people. If we did change over to socialized medicine, a lot of factors would cause negative effects in our economy.
The purpose of this essay is to see if government should add more tax to fast food to control obesity. This will help hospitals get more money to help solve cancer, make obese people smaller, let people live longer, spend less money, and allows people to travel better by adding more tax. When people eat junk food they are likely to die faster. If we go to fast food restaurants we are more likely to become obese. If government adds more tax people would spend less money.
Not when prices would have to fall over 90 percent if they’ve been set in terms of Bitcoin. Falling prices sound like a good thing, but they’re not. If prices were to fall then people would procrastinate on buying things, when this happens and companies notice then companies stop investing. If companies where to stop investing, if that were to happen then the economy would get worse and people would get in debts that they can’t afford to pay because of the economy. If that was ever to happen then banks would not profit, which would lead to banks being afraid to make loans which would just make the economy get worse and prices would plummet.
As well as this, an end to prohibition would eliminate the costs required to enforce it – an extra expenditure the government could not afford at this time. Economically, an end to prohibition would help strengthen the unstable situation in America: ending unproductive government spending as well as bringing new money into the system. Repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment would also meet social demands brought about by the crisis. Those facing hard times wanted to drink, and wanted an end to the law to allow them to do so more easily; thus the Great Depression added to the support for social groups already campaigning for its repeal. Both the economic and social effects of the Depression make it an important reason for the repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment, a concept supported by historian Joseph Gusfeld.
To rid out economy of the penny, the government would first needed to confront a public greatly in favor of preserving the penny. As indicated by Source E, a poll by the prestigious Harris group, public opinion shows a strong desire to keep the penny. Not only in removing the penny would need the census of two-thirds the population of these view, but also the physical wealth needed to fund for such costly and logistically near-impossible change. As shown in source A, state economies that depend on penny production for continued prosperity, such as Tennessee, would suffer economic adversity if this was to be amended. In the end, the benefits to be reaped by ending the penny are not worth the investment involved.
In order to combat this deficit spending, taxes are increased to generate more revenue to pay off this spending. In response, consumers will spend less money and save more, thus causing a decrease in consumption and less money in the economy. Soon, there is a decrease in investment because products are not being sold. Prices drop, and the economy lowers into a recession.
With more healthier food options and an increased opportunity for physical activity in white neighborhoods, the minority populations are at a much greater risk for obesity. “According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the non-Hispanic Black and Mexican-American population are more likely to be obese than the non- Hispanic White population”(Marchiondo). This gap is also contributed by the “food stamp cycle, in which over- eating by food-insecure families when food is plentiful, i.e., when food stamps or money for food is available, followed by a short period of involuntary food restriction, followed by overeating, could be a pattern that results in gradual weight gain over time” (Marchiondo). Adding to the already racially segregated society, the weight gap between whites and other races only adds to racial stereotypes. The government can help curb this issue by implementing programs to eliminate food deserts in low-income areas.
People will resist the changes which they think or suspect will make them worse off. If the change looks like it will cost more time and effort than seems reasonable, that is when people resist it. For example, Americans are afraid of health care reform and the thoughts of having a woman, black, or even a new president for that matter. Americans fear health care reform because it is a whole new proposal and they do not know what will take place when the change is made. They fear it will cost too much taxes will go through the roof.
Such as expensive fines, a license suspension, your car insurance rate increases, and possible prison time. Enforcing stricter texting and driving law and making harder consequences for breaking the law will encourage drivers to stop texting and driving because they wouldn’t want to face the strict consequences that come with breaking the