Obama A Modern Day Machiavellian Analysis

851 Words4 Pages
AP English Composition February 28, 2013 Is Obama A Modern Day Machiavellian –Title needs some type of punctuation- Through history there have been powerful and weak leaders, but only the powerful have survived. In “The Prince,” the Italian historian philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli writes a guide –explain a little more how it is a guide-for leaders to maintain power over states. Machiavelli uses his experiences from the diplomatic-politics, instead of dipolomats- and military to give advice to individuals-future leaders- trying-attempting- to maintain or seek power. When comparing the ideas of Machiavellianism to Barack Obama one can see there are not many similarities in power. Obama has acquired political strategies that are similar…show more content…
Obama built his base upon his own craft, but he is not a dictator that uses deceit in a harmful way. Machiavelli says that a prince cannot keep his word and by this Obama’s words are true, however the power of congress can sometimes over-ride his-Obama, take out “his”- word of power. This still leaves his word to be true with the option of agreeing or disagreeing with his words.- this last sentence does not tie into the paragraph; try moving it or adding another sentence to bring…show more content…
Obama is fortunate because he has used energetic youth through his word skills, knowledge and relations. Machiavelli states that fortune varies in men, “[He] thinks… Fortune is the mistress of one half our actions, and yet leaves the control of the other half…” (119). Machiavelli believes fortune will not work unless the ruler has spirit of energetic youth. Through Obama’s presidency it’s evident that he has maintained some political strategies similar but not exact to Machiavelli’s ideas. For Obama to be a Machiavellian prince he does not only need power, but it depends on how it’s used through military matters. It is considerable to consider Obama a prince because he focuses on cutting government spending on the military. Also, he deals with being blamed on how a prince should keep his word. – This last sentence does not blend with the paragraph- The opposition claims that he won the presidency not by good fortune and not through his own truthful words. They say he turned the key to “weak masters” and begged to foreign directors. Then he handed over the domestic agenda to inexperienced advisors. Private citizens-Citizens- become princes by buying their way into power (Machiavelli, 31). Basically, the opposition believes that Obama bribed his way to presidency with his weakness and weak
Open Document