Norms Versus Laws: the Pillars of a Thinking Society

1294 Words6 Pages
Norms Versus Laws: The Pillars of a Thinking Society There are two types of rules that hold a society together. First, there are implicit rules, which govern behavior within a society inherently. Second, there are explicit rules, which are created in a reactive manner to serve a function within a society. Both types of rules can function in any given society simultaneously. Depending on the society, they will be governed more by one or the other. To be clearer, an implicit rule can be described as a “social norm”, and an explicit rule as a law. The goal of this paper is to discuss and find the more important of the two within a society. We will explore firstly, the origins of the two types of rules and their roles in the creation of a society. Then, we will move to their usefulness in the maintenance of a society. We will conclude with a discussion on the effectiveness and enforcements of these rules involved in the society. Firstly, to understand the roles played by norms and laws in the formation of a society we must first understand why a society would form. An individual will give up some of his liberties to form a society, if said society offers him an aid in survival. The individual’s motivations of survival will be complimented by the condition that the individual survives in. Rousseau talks about this preferable condition in reference to human motivations in the beginnings of human collaboration. “Taught by experience that the love of well-being is the sole motive of human actions…” (46, Rousseau). These first collaborations and early societies did not have a system for creating or enforcing laws, or even a way of communicating to discuss these laws. The only types of rules that governed these early establishments were naturally, implicit rules. The weak did not start conflict with the strong in fear of their life (47, Rousseau). The woman stayed at
Open Document