Nero Debate: Roman History

1223 Words5 Pages
Joseph Jordan Nero Debate Paper Roman History The reign of Nero has been generally accepted to be a period of insanity and darkness in the Roman empire, however there is also new light being shed on this period of Roman history. It is true that Nero was a determined and violent man who was willing to smash any obstacle in his path in order to secure his throne, but did this necessarily make him any worse than his predecessors? If anything, atleast for a period, Nero was one of the more humane Roman leaders. Politics, whether it is in ancient Rome or even in the modern day, is a dirty game that demands certain reprehensible actions in extraordinary situations. The company one keeps plays a huge role in a leader’s actions as well, when…show more content…
Nero actively sought to create an Augustan rebirth after his incompetent predecessors, and with the aid of two brilliant men: the Praetorian prefect Burrus and the his mentor Seneca, he made many reforms that improved the lives of the common people exponentially. The tightly censored and regulated senate enjoyed greater freedom, he made many reforms that succeeded in stamping out corruption, he improved the infrastructure used by the common people, he passed intelligent reforms that helped create material prosperity, he even wanted to ban public executions, as he felt it was a barbaric practice. Perhaps this is not really a positive judgement of Nero, but rather a positive judgement of his advisors Burrus and Seneca, who played a huge role in forming Nero’s opinions and preventing people like Agrippina from exercising political power. Regardless, for a long time, Nero’s reign (or his clique’s reign) was brilliant and very close to a golden age, where there was stability, military successes, and many cultural and artistic…show more content…
Many people, due to popular culture, etc, believe it is a historical fact that Nero fiddled while Rome burned, but the historian Tacitus reminds us that there is no evidence of him doing this. While there is indeed evidence that Nero himself started the fire, if true it was not just a senseless or insane act of violence. When the fire was finally put out, Nero used this as an opportunity to bring a kind of architectural renaissance to Rome. Nero built an amazing Golden Palace and beautiful parks open to the people, all out of his very own pocket. Even in the modern world Nero’s Golden Palace is considered to be a marvel of beauty, art and
Open Document