Multiculturalims vs Interculturalism

5053 Words21 Pages
HALIL YILDIRIM 014001231 UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF FATIH CRITIQUE OF MULTICULTURALISM BEHALF OF INTERCULTURALIM: POSSIBLE FUTURE FOR INTERCULTURAL HELSINKI With increasing cultural and social differentiation in Europe and other parts of world by migration or relocation after following decolonization and post war era also has brought some ambiguous problems in the sense of disputes, contest between social and cultural groups. It causes to scholars discuss and reconsider the concept of ‘nation state’ and tries to find solutions to diversity like Multiculturalism, Interculturalism and Liberalism. That paper critically aims to examine definitions and some aspects of interculturalism and multiculturalism. It starts to discuss positive points of Interculturalism by comparing with multiculturalism. It can be basically exemplified by emphasizing main points of Interculturalism such as fostering interaction between cultures, providing collective identities among citizens and rejecting illiberal cultural perspectives. Moreover, it also aims to examine how can intercultural policies implement to city planning, how it can be fostered and what are the possible benefits of intercultural policies on city planning by specifically examining Helsinki City. KEY WORDS: Multiculturalism and Interculturalism, Intercultural City Policies, Helsinki ‘Multiculturalism’ vs. ‘Interculturalism’ To start with Multiculturalism; it’s good to pointed out that interpretations of such terms are quite challenging. That is noted by Bhabha (1998: 31) who has tried to explain the terms as a ‘portmanteau term’, which can cover a variety of meanings inside and critiques. In this respect, the idea of multiculturalism might be said to have a ‘chameleonic’ quality that facilitates its simultaneous adoption and rejection in the critique

More about Multiculturalims vs Interculturalism

Open Document