Much Ado / Earnest Comparison

1038 Words5 Pages
Much Ado About Nothing/The Importance Of Being Earnest Essay Literature always contributes commentary on the social norm and changes found in the world of mankind. In the cases of the two Horatian satires, Much Ado About Nothing and The Importance Of Being Earnest, the world existing around the times at which they were written were changing and it is evident in both. Satires are intended to make an audience look upon their wrong doings, and expose them in a light and humorous manner so that they may ponder analytically over their actions. Within both of the lifetimes of Shakespeare and Wilde, new ideals of marriage, personal pride, and love were all occurring, which is why they chose to criticize them in their plays. They both sought out to improve the outlooks upon all three by justifying that all can end disastrously. And just as in traditional love stories, both works out in the end so that the constructive blow to one’s self was softer. But, on the other hand, the ways in which they were carried out linguistically were quite dissimilar. To embark on the views and opinions of marriage, both writers reflect a sense of parallelism with it in their texts. With the case of Much Ado, Shakespeare states that a “Man is a giddy thing...” (V.IV.75), stating that men are impulsive and frivolous as to relationships. And with the same token, Wilde writes “I really don’t see anything romantic in proposing. It is romantic to be in love.” (I.1.3.) meaning that marriage isn’t romantic. He even takes it a step further stating, “The very essence of romance is uncertainty. If I ever get married, I’ll certainly try to forget the fact.” (I), depicting marriage as completely unromantic. He uses euphonious words, like “romance” and “love”, to show that the character does have an appeal to it just as the common man does. But he, the common man, is too afraid of such a great
Open Document