Morality and Divergence in Updike’s “a & P”

2278 Words10 Pages
Morality and Divergence in Updike’s “A & P” Born in 1932 in rural Pennsylvania, John Hoyer Updike was an only child whose mother was also an author (writing short stories and novels) and his father was a high school science teacher. Although the family experienced financial difficulties, Updike’s grades allowed him to receive a full scholarship to attend Harvard University (Caldwell). Besides being an American novelist, Updike was also famous as a poet, a writer of short stories and was also a literary critic. He was most notably recognized for his Rabbit Angstrom stories. Updike passed away in 2009 from lung cancer. John Updike’s short story “A & P” was first published in The New Yorker in 1961 and has become something of a classic of college literature anthologies (Dessner). Walter Wells states that John Updike’s penchant for appropriating great works of literature and giving them contemporary restatement in his own fiction is abundantly documented (Wells). What is wonderful about this story is Updike’s descriptive quality and the characterization of the protagonist Sammy. The story’s curtness and its absurdly innocent yet ethically aspiring teen helps depict his social and moral dilemma. Throughout the story, we examine the mental “plight” of our narrator Sammy and what ultimately leads to his resignation as a cashier at the local A & P. There are a few conflicts which help to create the plot within this story. There is conflict between the girls and Sammy, between the girls and the manager, Sammy and the manager, and also Sammy and himself. Within these conflicts the story is able to develop a purpose and gives it a sense of meaning. Everything is happening because of a previous action. Therefore, the question looms; why does Sammy quit his job? At the end, does he have an epiphany of sorts, or is indefiniteness forecasted

More about Morality and Divergence in Updike’s “a & P”

Open Document