Essay Question 1 The Mongols were brilliant strategists and tacticians. The Mongols by nature were extremely resilient and tough people since they weren't softened by the wealthy and comfortable city life of China and other nations. They were nomadic and tribal. This means that there was much rivalry between them. However, during the High Middle Ages, a man named Temujin was able to break old traditions and unite all the Mongols.
Leaders from the communist party worked to claim power and weren’t born into it. By definition of the two types of rule it should be suggested that Russian government ought to have been completely different with no similarities. However, it can be strongly argued that this was not the case. All Russian leaders during this period were motivated by the need to maintain their power and their ideological views which is shown to be one of the main similarities between them. Asides from the obvious ideological differences between the Tsars and the communists, they do not differ all that much in other ruling aspects such as use of repression and the role of themselves as a ruler.
The success of the Bolsheviks in the Russian Civil War was due to Lenin, Trotsky and their combined political, social and military capabilities as they were experts. They introduced various political and military policies that enabled them to raise support in Russia and create a dominant and successful military force. Both leaders showed immense dedication to the socialist cause and in doing so provided ruthless and brilliant leadership that ensured Bolshevik victory in the Russian Civil War. Peasant support for the Bolsheviks was a result of the Whites political and social faults. Firstly, the Whites treated the peasant class harshly, they did not see the advantage of gaining the support of the larger lower class as about 82% and they did not take full advantage of that.
The Mongols: How Barbaric Were the “Barbarians?” The Mongols are credited with building a legendary empire that would sweep across much of Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe. Their reach extended from Vietnam to Syria and from Korea to Poland (Background Essay). The Mongol’s reputation was clear when the world labeled them "barbarians." But is that the whole story? Though they were indeed fierce fighters and sometimes capable of terrible acts of retribution against those who dared to defy them, the Mongols were not the ruthless, bloodthirsty barbarians often pictured.
The White Armies had outnumbered the Red Armies but the Red Army still managed to win the Civil war. How did that happen? The Bolsheviks had some advantages which led them to their success while the Whites who had some disadvantages had led them to their fall. One of the advantages of the Bolsheviks from the Whites is that they are united and disciplined by Lenin and Trotsky. Trotsky, who was in control of the Bolsheviks by that time, had magnificently handled them.
But after the collapse of Rome, Persia, and Han or classical societies, trading fell. In addition to, once the Mongols took power in 1200 CE, trade along the Silk Road increased. This is because of the safety of the Silk Road because the Mongols protected it. Interactions on the Silk Road changed as related to amount of trading because different societies had different economies and different technologies. Classical societies traded in the Silk Road because it was the fastest and cheapest to do.
Stalin’s terror was not limited to the party and extended and he condemned intellectuals for being “anti-Soviet”. During the 1917 revolution, there was little to no use of terror or force as it was a seemingly painless takeover. This is not to say that the Russian people were not accustomed to violence as many people still resented actions of the Okhrana during tsarist times and the mass executions and deportations that were carried out. The Russian people had also just been subjected to Lenin’s “Red Terror” which was a campaign of mass killings, torture and systematic oppression led by the Cheka, the Bolshevik secret police. It is estimated that between 50,000 and 140,000 people were killed in this campaign during the Russian Civil War.
The empires of the time “showed remarkable resilience, providing a strong focus for the numerous groups under their rule.” (Prof. J. Duindam, Leiden University) The Mongols through excellent military cunning and having one of the greatest leaders in history, allowed them to become a major force in Eurasia. This essay will document the rapid ascent of the Mongolian empire and how they extended their borders into many regions of Eurasia. Like all empires, the Mongols began as a group of tribes and grew from there. There are many possible starting points, but the majority of historians mark the group of tribal factions located around Lake Bajkal as the original Mongols. This community was rife with “cultural exchange and development.” (Mongols Origins.
The Reds relentlessly employed superior military technique, but also were able to win over a far greater number of people through their innovative and attractive land policies. Conversely, the White army was quite incapable of waging a successful fight against their enemy. They lacked proper military and socio-political technique, struggling to mobilize their forces with the same
In the short time that Snowball had authority over Animal Farm, he seemed to be a righteous head of power. On closer inspection though, it is revealed Snowball is not completely honourable. Ultimately, it is hard to know whether Snowball would have carried on his moral leadership, due to his brief time in power. Snowball, in contrast to Napoleon, is conveyed as having more integrity. Snowball’s control of Animal Farm is seen as decent, whereas Napoleon’s is corrupt.