Misery: Book vs. Novel

770 Words4 Pages
MISERY: BOOK VS MOVIE Directed: Rob Reiner Author: Stephen King Critique: Sarah Johnson Reading Stephen Kings’s novel Misery in class and then watching Rob Reiner’s film based upon the Misery novel I definitely prefer the book rather than the movie. The situation is very unique and suspenseful that you won’t be able to put down the book. But the book had many spine chilling parts that were not featured in the movie. Firstly the novel is about, Paul Sheldon who is a famous author. He is crippled in a car crash, but thankfully he ends up in the home of a former nurse, Annie Wilkes, who takes care of him while he slowly recovers. Too bad Annie turns out to be every writer’s worst nightmare: the obsessed fan. A very character-driven novel, Misery is about Paul’s struggle to stay alive while he is at the mercy of his maniac- depressed and psychotic host. Stephen King did a great job in putting the reader in the middle of her instability right along with Paul. You never know what she’s going to do next, and come to realize she is capable of anything. This makes for nail-biting suspense all through out. Misery is an absolutely suspenseful story. It’s amazing how so much can happen without even leaving the house! Secondly the movie, has a few problems that I was not a fan of. First problem was the casting. Kathy Bates shines as Annie Wilkes. She looks the part, sounds the part and just all around the perfect person to play Annie! The movie is just worth watching just to see the character come to life through her. But James Caan, who plays Paul Sheldon was so generic he seemed invisible. The film also fails to capture the feeling that Paul is not in control. In the book, Paul is very insidious in defying Wilkes. He sneaks out of his room multiple times, hides extra pills, he also stashes food to prepare for Annie’s next mood swing. Everything
Open Document