Military Intervention Essay

933 Words4 Pages
Should military intervention be? A generation ago, the terms "military intervention" and "conflict resolution" would almost never have been uttered in the same breath. The field of conflict resolution has its roots in the peace movements that dotted the 20th century, most of whose members found the use of force abhorrent. Militaries have intervented in the domestic affairs of other countries time and time again, but rarely they attempt to end a complex emergency or intractable conflict. There are a number of advantages to military intervention. First and foremost, military intervention can potentially save hundreds or even thousands of lives. Often governments hurts and pains civilians, military intervention can stop it. While there are certainly some great advantages for military intervention, there are also a great deal of disadvantages. Unfortunately, governments often fail to consider peaceful options, progressing immediately to violence. In spite of that military intervention can be successful, we should avoid this method of solving problems. The first reason is that the most of military interventions goes with misfortune and fails. There are a lot of types of interventions. There must be an accurate and independent evaluation of the scale and nature of humanitarian needs. In Africa, humanitarian crises are rarely as severe as the relief agencies and media make out. In the Sahel in the early 1970s, demographic investigations show that at most 100,000 people died (Charles,2003). Firstly, we don’t know what result will give us military intervention ,until the last decade of military force was used most often to achieve a state's geopolitical goals of protecting and enhancing its territory, population, and other critical resources. The new year is scarcely a month old. Yet we have seen enough to know that the fires raging in different parts of the Middle East
Open Document