Unless you are going to offer a sort of “reward” for coming forward, this just wouldn’t work. So, after extensive research and going through many politicians ideas, but coming up with one “superpower” if you must, the solution is actually quite simple. Instead of amnesty, the deporting of all illegal immigrants, or making them all “legal”, why not offer a different view on immigration? To “adopt” immigration, without making them United States citizens. To have all of the illegal immigrants come forward, with incentive along with it.
Arizona confirmed that if the government has not taken any far decisions on the issue of illegal immigration, people have to do it themselves. Maybe eventually the government will pay attention to the situation in the country and will try to find a suitable solution for that. It is true that United Sates is a "nation of immigrants," however when these immigrants are breaking the law of the country they want to be in, the action must be taken to ensure the security for law abiding citizens of the country, for them to be safe and sleep calm. It is already bad, don’t wait until it will get worse and maybe even too late to repair
Isn’t the federal law in charge of immigration? Why must our local officials then deal with immigration issues? We are creating a vicious circle of hate, what guarantees the citizens that police officials will not violate or take advantage of the power that they have been given? This new law is “giving police officers a green light to harass anyone who looks or sounds foreign” explained Alessandra Soler Meetze, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona. The question again arises, how will the officer detect these illegal immigrants?
This legislation, however, proved to have many loopholes around it for illegal immigrants to obtain drivers’ licenses regardless of their illegal status because the states were not obliged to conform to the standards. Therefore, states like Washington and Oregon that did not conform to the national standards until later in 2008 when the federal government made it that non-conforming licenses were no longer accepted in any federal agency, became a sort of a safe haven for a lot of illegal immigrants from various states to obtain drivers’
Do Stricter Gun-Control Laws Help Prevent Gun-Related Injuries/Deaths? Gun control arguments are a hot topic in America and around the world; it is a topic not likely to go away anytime soon. Arguments for and against carry their own merit and can be lengthy and broad by nature, but our intent is to debate the effect of gun-control laws and the effect they have on gun-related injuries/deaths. The argument presented here will get to the crux of why laws should or should not be enacted to prevent social ills. Most agree that gun-related injury or death of innocent citizens should never be tolerated, but there are opinions on the course to take in an effort to discover a solution.
One group of proponents of the bill argued that the California Supreme Court did not have the right to rule the ban on same-sex marriages unconstitutional earlier this year. They said that Prop 8, rather, would ensure that the issue be democratically decided upon. But our founding fathers didn’t build this nation on a system of complete democracy, fearing the excess of the masses against minority groups. Instead, they created an electoral system and different branches of government to uphold the ideals of the constitution. This first camp ignores the historical dangers of allowing the majority to vote on a minority’s civil rights.
Presidential War Powers H. Hansana San Antonio College Professor Delagarza Presidential War Powers The current political debate between Congress and the President regarding the legality of using U.S. troops to intervene in foreign domestic issues when no declaration of war has been declared has negatively impacted generations of Americans without any effective legislative or judicial intervention. This power to deploy troops into hostile environments around the world has been a legitimate abuse of Presidential power, the action has impacted our standing in the world and is not an effective foreign policy tool. Less presidential war powers or use of military authorization would do the United States good, the Commander in Chief
What Good is Assimilation? “No American should ever live under a cloud of suspicion just because of what they look like.” Mr. Obama emphasized his concern that the intact Arizona’s immigration law, “show me your papers”, could lead to racial profiling on June25, 2012 after announcing the Supreme Court’s decision. Immigration is one of the highly controversial issues in the U.S. Some people claim that immigrant assimilation is not occurring and that instead most immigrants are a burden on in the U.S. society. However, before the society requires assimilation and criticized the lack of immigrant assimilation into the U.S., any requirement for assimilating should be based on the true understanding of immigrants.
For instance, I now realize that not all illegal immigrants are migrant workers. While it is true that a majority of undocumented residents in the United States are from Mexico, the sealing off of our borders or mass deportation is simply impractical and economically not feasible. I believe that immigration can be dealt with through an electronically secure documented fashion. My assumption today is that the United States has the technology and the means to make documentation extremely difficult to counterfeit and replicate. A worker without this proper documentation would find it extremely difficult to work in the United States, thus forcing those without the necessary forms to be deported.
The strangest aspect of America’s immigration debate is the intense opposition among right-wing hardliners to allowing more immigrants into the country. Most opposition to illegal immigrants stems from an admirable respect for the law, but there is a curious belief among the far right that being on the wrong side of the border—purely through an accident of birth—makes you undeserving of equal rights. They wish to deny citizenship to those who are willing to work for it, when they themselves acquired it through no effort save that of having been born on the right side of the border. These same people, curiously enough, are also of the following opinions: no one is entitled to anything, people who work harder than others deserve more, and the economy should be free from government regulation. This much the amusingly named teabaggers have made clear in hundreds of “tea parties” organized to protest government policies they view as “socialistic”.